Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Hawaii Supreme Court Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts: Final Report (SCMF-24-0000305)
Supreme Court of Hawaii, Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts · Hawaii
last revised 2025-12-16last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
ReportProposedDisclosureVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsJudges' use of AICourts' own AI deploymentDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Hawaii's judiciary studied AI for eighteen months and concluded HRCP Rule 11 already covers AI abuse, while recommending the Supreme Court consider a federal-style AI disclosure declaration for state-court filings. The committee separately adopted internal guardrails for judiciary use of AI tools.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff, lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Final Report · 16 Dec 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- www.courts.state.hi.us/
What the document requires
- Existing rules including HRCP Rule 11 are broad enough to provide adequate safeguards against AI abuse in state-court filings
- The Court should consider adopting a disclosure rule mirroring D. Haw. General Order 23-1
- Under the proposed rule an AI-assisted filing would be accompanied by a declaration confirming AI use and that all cited authorities have been verified
- The committee adopted Hawaii State Judiciary Guardrails for the Acceptable Use of AI Tools and Platforms for judges and staff
- Advisory only; no implementing Supreme Court order as of September 2026
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final Reportcurrent | 2025-12-16 | Filed in SCMF-24-0000305 | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Hawaii Supreme Court Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts: Final Report (SCMF-24-0000305)" (Supreme Court of Hawaii, Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts, Final Report, 2025-12-16), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-hi-supreme-court-ai-committee-final-report (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court