Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Eastern District of Texas Local Rules CV-11(g) and AT-3(m) on Generative AI
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas · Texas
last revised 2025-12-01last verified 2026-09-161 versioncountry page →
Court ruleIn forceVerification duty
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Eastern District of Texas amended its local rules to address generative AI. Current CV-11(g) tells pro se litigants and represented parties that they remain bound by Rule 11 and must review and verify all content generated with AI, while AT-3(m) similarly reminds attorneys that AI cannot replace independent legal judgment.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 01 Dec 2023
- Current version
- Amended · 01 Dec 2025
- Last verified
- 16 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Local Rule CV-11(g) warns that GenAI can produce factually or legally inaccurate content.
- Litigants using GenAI must review and verify all content to satisfy Rule 11.
- Attorney Rule AT-3(m) applies the same responsibility to lawyers.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendedcurrent | 2025-12-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Eastern District of Texas Local Rules CV-11(g) and AT-3(m) on Generative AI" (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Amended, 2025-12-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-txed-court-2023-local-rules-generative-ai (accessed 2026-09-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)