Sentencia T-323 de 2024: due process and judges' use of generative AI (ChatGPT)
Constitutional Court of Colombia (Corte Constitucional)
last revised 2024-08-02last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forceVerification dutySupervisionDisclosure
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Reviewing a tutela in which a Cartagena circuit judge used ChatGPT to help reason a health-rights ruling for a child with autism, the Court found no breach of due process on the facts but set criteria for judicial AI use and ordered the Superior Council of the Judiciary to issue guidelines within four months.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 02 Aug 2024
- Current version
- Sala Segunda de Revision, MP Juan Carlos Cortes Gonzalez · 02 Aug 2024
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- AI may not replace the judge's reasoning; the natural-judge guarantee requires a human decision.
- Criteria: transparency, accountability, privacy, verification, risk prevention and non-discrimination.
- Judges should disclose and verify any AI use in a decision.
- Order to the Consejo Superior de la Judicatura to issue guidelines, which produced Acuerdo PCSJA24-12243.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sala Segunda de Revision, MP Juan Carlos Cortes Gonzalezcurrent | 2024-08-02 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Sentencia T-323 de 2024: due process and judges' use of generative AI (ChatGPT)" (Constitutional Court of Colombia (Corte Constitucional), Sala Segunda de Revision, MP Juan Carlos Cortes Gonzalez, 2024-08-02), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/co-corte-constitucional-t-323-2024 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI