Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / Other

Sentencia T-323 de 2024: due process and judges' use of generative AI (ChatGPT)

Constitutional Court of Colombia (Corte Constitucional)

last revised 2024-08-02last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

Judgment (guidance)In forceVerification dutySupervisionDisclosure

map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesDuty to verify AI output

Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.

Reviewing a tutela in which a Cartagena circuit judge used ChatGPT to help reason a health-rights ruling for a child with autism, the Court found no breach of due process on the facts but set criteria for judicial AI use and ordered the Superior Council of the Judiciary to issue guidelines within four months.

Applies to
judges, court-staff
Effective
02 Aug 2024
Current version
Sala Segunda de Revision, MP Juan Carlos Cortes Gonzalez · 02 Aug 2024
Last verified
04 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • AI may not replace the judge's reasoning; the natural-judge guarantee requires a human decision.
  • Criteria: transparency, accountability, privacy, verification, risk prevention and non-discrimination.
  • Judges should disclose and verify any AI use in a decision.
  • Order to the Consejo Superior de la Judicatura to issue guidelines, which produced Acuerdo PCSJA24-12243.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Sala Segunda de Revision, MP Juan Carlos Cortes Gonzalezcurrent2024-08-02First version recorded.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Sentencia T-323 de 2024: due process and judges' use of generative AI (ChatGPT)" (Constitutional Court of Colombia (Corte Constitucional), Sala Segunda de Revision, MP Juan Carlos Cortes Gonzalez, 2024-08-02), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/co-corte-constitucional-t-323-2024 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in Other