CSM Recommendations on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial activity (Recomendacoes no uso de IA)
High Council of the Judiciary (Conselho Superior da Magistratura)
last revised 2026-04-08last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceDisclosureVerification dutyProhibitionConfidentialitySupervision
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesCourts' own AI deploymentData protection and legal AIMandatory AI trainingVendor due diligence
Recommendations proposed by the CSM's AI Monitoring Group for judges' use of AI, citing AI Act Annex III point 8(a). Ten principles include effective human control, non-substitution, exclusive judicial responsibility and transparency; only systems supplied by the case-management platform or the CSM may be used; every AI-assisted decision must carry an express reference to AI use.
- Applies to
- judges
- Effective
- 08 Apr 2026
- Current version
- Approved by the Plenario 8 April 2026; PDF published May 2026 · 08 Apr 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Principle 2 and Rec. 7: AI may never replace judges in deciding, assessing facts or evidence, or interpreting the law.
- Rec. 6: complete, critical personal review and validation of any AI draft before it becomes a decision.
- Rec. 8: no judicial data in non-validated systems; open tools only for study on open sources.
- Rec. 10: express reference in the decision that it was produced with the aid of an AI system and fully reviewed by the signatory.
- Rec. 9: GDPR principles, security, traceability and no reuse; CSM-validated systems presumed compliant.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by the Plenario 8 April 2026; PDF published May 2026current | 2026-04-08 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "CSM Recommendations on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial activity (Recomendacoes no uso de IA)" (High Council of the Judiciary (Conselho Superior da Magistratura), Approved by the Plenario 8 April 2026; PDF published May 2026, 2026-04-08), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/pt-csm-recomendacoes-uso-ia-atividade-jurisdicional (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI