Tribunale di Firenze, Sezione Imprese, order of 14 March 2025 (ChatGPT-invented Cassazione citations)
Court of Florence (Tribunale di Firenze) · Tuscany
last revised 2025-03-14last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forceVerification dutySupervision
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputSupervision of AI workSanctions for AI misuse
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
First reported Italian hallucination case. In an IP interim appeal the respondent's brief cited Cassazione rulings that did not exist; counsel said a trainee had used ChatGPT without his knowledge. The court rejected an Article 96 c.p.c. reckless-litigation claim because the citations did not affect the defence and no bad faith was shown, but censured the failure to verify.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Order 14 March 2025, RG 11053/2024 · 14 Mar 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Failure to verify AI-generated citations is censured even where no sanction follows.
- Art. 96 c.p.c. requires bad faith or gross negligence plus concrete effect on the proceedings.
- The signing lawyer answers for a collaborator's undisclosed AI use.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Order 14 March 2025, RG 11053/2024current | 2025-03-14 | Reported by Litis.it; official text not obtained. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Tribunale di Firenze, Sezione Imprese, order of 14 March 2025 (ChatGPT-invented Cassazione citations)" (Court of Florence (Tribunale di Firenze), Order 14 March 2025, RG 11053/2024, 2025-03-14), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/it-tribunale-firenze-2025-chatgpt-citations (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI