Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Civil Procedures: Artificial Intelligence
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Kelley B. Hodge · Pennsylvania
last revised 2024-05-10last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCompetence
map categories:Self-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Kelley B. Hodge’s civil procedures state that anyone, counsel or pro se litigant, using generative artificial intelligence in connection with filing a pleading, motion, or paper, or serving or delivering discovery requests, responses, or objections, must comply with Rules 11(b), 26(g), other relevant rules, and applicable ethical rules.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 10 May 2024
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Applies to counsel and pro se litigants using GAI in filings.
- Also covers discovery requests, responses, and objections served or delivered.
- The procedure requires compliance with Rules 11(b), 26(g), other relevant rules, and ethical rules.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2024-05-10 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Civil Procedures: Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Kelley B. Hodge, Original, 2024-05-10), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-paed-hodge-2024-gai-rule11-26g (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)