Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Otis D. Wright II · California
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Otis D. Wright II’s Central District of California procedures require briefs to include a certificate addressing generative AI. The certificate discloses use or non-use, and when AI was used, states that the filer reviewed, revised, supplemented, and independently verified factual and legal accuracy.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Specified briefs must include a certificate addressing compliance with the generative AI rule.
- Parties using generative AI must disclose use and certify review, accuracy, and Rule 11 compliance.
- The certificate form covers AI use and non-use.
- The certificate requires independent verification of factual and legal accuracy.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Otis D. Wright II, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cacd-wright-2026-ai-certificate (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)