Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Indiana Supreme Court Office of Judicial Administration: trial-court AI policy toolkit
Indiana Supreme Court, Office of Judicial Administration · Indiana
last revised 2026-02-17last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
PolicyIn forceRisk classificationSupervision
map categories:Judges' use of AICourts' own AI deployment
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Indiana's judiciary is governing AI administratively rather than by rule. An AI Governance Committee was formed in autumn 2024 and an AI policy toolkit for trial courts was released in February 2026; attorney-facing guidance is still pending. Contents were not verified in this run.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Toolkit · 17 Feb 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- times.courts.in.gov/2026/02/17/ai-toolkit/
What the document requires
- Toolkit for Indiana trial courts adopting local AI policies (contents not yet verified)
- Follows creation of the Indiana Supreme Court AI Governance Committee in autumn 2024
- Attorney-facing guidance still pending as of September 2026
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toolkitcurrent | 2026-02-17 | Released to Indiana trial courts | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Indiana Supreme Court Office of Judicial Administration: trial-court AI policy toolkit" (Indiana Supreme Court, Office of Judicial Administration, Toolkit, 2026-02-17), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-in-supreme-court-trial-court-ai-toolkit (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court