Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / United States (state)

Utah Judicial Council Interim Rules on the Use of Generative AI

Utah Judicial Council · Utah

last revised 2025-10-27last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

PolicyIn forceProhibitionPermissiveConfidentiality

map categories:Judges' use of AICourts' own AI deploymentVendor due diligence

From 27 October 2025 the Utah Judicial Council operates an allow-list policy for generative AI in court-related work and on court-owned devices. Eight named tools are expressly permitted and any AI tool not expressly permitted is prohibited, giving Utah one of the most restrictive US state judiciary AI postures.

Applies to
judges, court-staff
Effective
See version history
Current version
Interim rules · 27 Oct 2025
Last verified
04 Sept 2026
Official text
sites.google.com/utcourts.gov/courts-hr/policy/ai-information

What the document requires

  • Applies to generative AI used for court-related work or on court-owned devices from 27 October 2025
  • Eight tools are expressly permitted: Adobe Firefly, ChatGPT, Claude.ai (Beta), Gemini Pro, Microsoft Copilot, NotebookLM, Webex Cisco AI Assistant and Westlaw
  • Any AI tool not expressly permitted in the interim rules is prohibited

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Interim rulescurrent2025-10-27Interim rules implemented for court-related work and court-owned devicesofficial

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Utah Judicial Council Interim Rules on the Use of Generative AI" (Utah Judicial Council, Interim rules, 2025-10-27), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-ut-judicial-council-interim-genai-rules (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in United States (state)