Guideline on Automated Decision-Making and Profiling (ADMP) under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010
Personal Data Protection Department [Jabatan Perlindungan Data Peribadi], Ministry of Digital
last revised 2026-04-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
RegulationIn forceSupervisionClient consentCompetenceRisk classification
map categories:Data protection and legal AIClient consent and transparencyVendor due diligence
A regulatory guideline under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (Act 709) as amended in 2024. Part E governs AI and generative AI in profiling and automated decision-making, requiring human oversight, barring decisions made on a sole automated factor, and requiring staff training and appointed reviewers.
- Applies to
- firms, providers, all
- Effective
- 01 Apr 2026
- Current version
- Issued April 2026 · 01 Apr 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Part E applies the PDPA to AI and generative AI used in automated decision-making and profiling.
- Human oversight is required; decisions must not rest on a sole automated factor.
- Data subjects must be informed of AI use in automated decision-making and profiling through the privacy notice.
- Requires measures against over-reliance when developing, supplying or using AI systems and services.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issued April 2026current | 2026-04-01 | Only the month of issue (April 2026) is established, so the date is recorded as the first of that month. Issued with companion DPIA and Data Protection by Design guidelines. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guideline on Automated Decision-Making and Profiling (ADMP) under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010" (Personal Data Protection Department [Jabatan Perlindungan Data Peribadi], Ministry of Digital, Issued April 2026, 2026-04-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/my-jpdp-admp-guideline (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI