Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
General Order 23-01: Pleadings Using Generative Artificial Intelligence
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma · Oklahoma
last revised 2023-07-25last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification dutyConfidentiality
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Western District of Oklahoma Bankruptcy Court requires an attestation for any filed document drafted with generative AI. The attestation must identify the tool and specific text portions, certify that the document was checked by reliable means, and certify that no confidential information was disclosed to unauthorized parties.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 01 Sept 2023
- Current version
- Original · 25 Jul 2023
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- AI-drafted documents must be accompanied by an attestation.
- The attestation must identify the program and the specific AI-generated portions.
- The attestation must certify accuracy checking and no unauthorized confidential disclosure.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2023-07-25 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "General Order 23-01: Pleadings Using Generative Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Original, 2023-07-25), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-okwb-court-2023-generative-ai-pleadings-order (accessed 2026-09-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)