Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Responsible AI Policy Framework v2.1
Connecticut Judicial Branch · Connecticut
last revised 2024-02-01last verified 2026-09-031 version
PolicyIn forceRisk classificationRecord-keepingCompetence
An internal governance framework adopted by the Connecticut Judicial Branch on 1 February 2024 for how the branch itself procures, deploys and monitors AI systems. It sets principles of accountability, transparency, fairness and security for court technology, requires risk assessment before deployment, and keeps human decision-makers responsible. It does not regulate filings by lawyers or litigants.
- Applies to
- court-staff, judges
- Effective
- 01 Feb 2024
- Current version
- v2.1 · 01 Feb 2024
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- AI systems used by the branch must be inventoried and risk-assessed before deployment.
- Human oversight is required for any AI that affects court operations or the public.
- Procurement must address data security, bias testing and vendor accountability.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| v2.1current | 2024-02-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Responsible AI Policy Framework v2.1" (Connecticut Judicial Branch, v2.1, 2024-02-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/ct-judicial-branch-responsible-ai-policy-framework (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court