Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Disclosure and Certification Requirements – Generative Artificial Intelligence
U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii — Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi · Hawaii
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi’s District of Hawaii generative AI standing order requires parties using generative AI to prepare documents filed with the court to disclose that use and the specific tool in the document. The filer must certify accuracy review, including citations and legal authority, and remains responsible under Rule 11.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Any party using generative AI in preparation of documents filed with the court must disclose AI use in the document.
- The disclosure must identify the specific AI tool used.
- The filer must certify in the document that AI-drafted portions were checked for accuracy.
- The accuracy certification expressly includes citations and legal authority.
- The filer remains responsible under Rule 11 and applicable professional rules.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Disclosure and Certification Requirements – Generative Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii — Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-hid-kobayashi-undated-generative-ai (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)