Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Guidance on Responsible AI Use in Court Proceedings
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell · Colorado
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Practice direction / noteIn forceCompetence
map categories:Self-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell’s District of Colorado guidance discusses responsible AI use and hallucinations in court submissions. It expressly states that it is not an order and does not create new requirements, but suggests conferral, court notice, and factors for addressing hallucinations.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The guidance focuses on AI hallucinations but says it does not establish new rules or requirements.
- The court encourages conferral when an opponent’s filing appears to contain a hallucination.
- After conferral, parties may jointly email chambers to identify the issue and resolution.
- The court lists factors it may consider when addressing hallucinations.
- The guidance flags privacy, bias, deepfakes, misinformation, and human control as broader AI concerns.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guidance on Responsible AI Use in Court Proceedings" (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cod-braswell-2025-ai-guidance (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)