Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Judge John A. Kazen Court Procedures in Criminal Cases Section 7
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas — Judge John A. Kazen · Texas
last revised 2025-06-23last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forcePermissive
map categories:Self-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Kazen’s criminal procedures add a case-specific AI section for criminal matters. Attorneys and self-represented litigants must thoroughly review any filing prepared with generative AI for factual and legal accuracy, remain accountable for submitted content, and may face sanctions for inaccurate or frivolous AI-generated content.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 23 Jun 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Criminal procedures require factual and legal review of AI-assisted filings before submission.
- The procedures state counsel and self-represented litigants remain fully accountable.
- The section incorporates SDTX General Order 2025-04.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-06-23 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Judge John A. Kazen Court Procedures in Criminal Cases Section 7" (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas — Judge John A. Kazen, Original, 2025-06-23), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-txsd-kazen-2025-criminal-generative-ai-procedures (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)