Tribunal da Relacao de Guimaraes, 10 Feb 2026: six non-existent appellate rulings generated by AI
Guimaraes Court of Appeal (Tribunal da Relacao de Guimaraes)
last revised 2026-02-10last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forceVerification duty
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputSanctions for AI misuse
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
In a criminal appeal concerning illegal weapons possession the defence cited excerpts from six Relacao and Supreme Court rulings that do not exist. The court called this absolutely inadmissible, explained AI hallucination, held legal professionals to a higher standard, ordered 5 UC in costs and suggested reporting the lawyer to the Ordem dos Advogados.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Acordao 10 February 2026 · 10 Feb 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Citing non-existent case law generated by AI is inadmissible and breaches professional duties.
- Costs of 5 UC, about EUR 500, imposed on the appellant.
- Referral to the Portuguese Bar Association suggested.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acordao 10 February 2026current | 2026-02-10 | Reported by CNN Portugal on 3 March 2026; official text not obtained. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Tribunal da Relacao de Guimaraes, 10 Feb 2026: six non-existent appellate rulings generated by AI" (Guimaraes Court of Appeal (Tribunal da Relacao de Guimaraes), Acordao 10 February 2026, 2026-02-10), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/pt-relacao-guimaraes-2026-acordaos-inexistentes (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI