Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements for Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas — Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk · Texas
last revised 2023-11-27last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Kacsmaryk’s certificate requires attorneys appearing before him to certify compliance with judge-specific requirements. It contains the same generative-AI attestation model as Judge Starr’s form, requiring no AI drafting or human review of any AI-drafted language, citations, paraphrases, and legal analysis.
- Applies to
- lawyers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 27 Nov 2023
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
- Official text
- www.txnd.uscourts.gov/judge/judge-matthew-kacsmaryk
What the document requires
- Attorneys must certify compliance with Judge Kacsmaryk’s judge-specific requirements.
- The AI clause requires either no GenAI drafting or human accuracy checking before submission.
- The certificate states counsel remain responsible under attorney-discipline rules.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2023-11-27 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Certificate Regarding Judge-Specific Requirements for Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk" (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas — Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk, Original, 2023-11-27), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-txnd-kacsmaryk-2023-generative-ai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)