Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order Governing Criminal Cases
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio — Judge Michael J. Newman · Ohio
last revised 2025-08-27last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureProhibition
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsSelf-represented litigantsAI barred from deciding cases
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Newman’s Southern District of Ohio criminal standing order adds an AI provision effective August 27, 2025. It prohibits attorneys and pro se parties from using AI to prepare filings, excludes legal search engines, internet search engines, and Microsoft Suite-type products, and requires immediate notice if AI use is discovered.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- 22 Nov 2024
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 27 Aug 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The standing criminal order states that a new AI provision is effective August 27, 2025.
- No attorney for a party or pro se party may use AI in preparing any filing submitted to the court.
- The ban excludes information gathered from Westlaw, LexisNexis, Google, Bing, and Microsoft Suite-type products.
- Parties and counsel must immediately inform the court if they discover AI use in any document filed in their case or an opponent’s case.
- The provision aims to prevent citation of false, misleading, or hallucinated cases and law.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2025-08-27 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order Governing Criminal Cases" (United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio — Judge Michael J. Newman, As posted (undated), 2025-08-27), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-ohsd-newman-2025-criminal-ai-ban (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)