Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
In re Local Civil Rule 7(E) and Artificial Intelligence
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia — Judge M. Hannah Lauck · Virginia
last revised 2026-09-01last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Chief Judge Lauck of the Eastern District of Virginia requires disclosure and citation review certification in all civil cases assigned to her. The September 1, 2026 standing order says any party using generative AI to prepare a filing must identify that use and certify citation accuracy.
- Applies to
- parties
- Effective
- 01 Sept 2026
- Current version
- Original · 01 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The standing order applies to all civil cases assigned to Chief United States District Judge M. Hannah Lauck.
- Local Civil Rule 7(E) does not apply to actions covered by the standing order.
- Any party using generative AI for preparation of a filing must identify that use in the filing.
- The party must provide a certification that all citations were reviewed for accuracy.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-09-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "In re Local Civil Rule 7(E) and Artificial Intelligence" (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia — Judge M. Hannah Lauck, Original, 2026-09-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-vaed-lauck-2026-genai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)