Circular No. 25: Good-practice guide for the use of generative AI in the Judiciary of Santa Fe
Supreme Court of Justice of Santa Fe (Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Provincia de Santa Fe) · Santa Fe
last revised 2025-04-04last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
country page →GuidanceIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialitySupervisionDisclosure
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesCourts' own AI deployment
Minimum acceptable-use standards for judges, defenders and staff granted generative-AI tools by the Santa Fe Supreme Court: independent verification of all outputs, protection of sensitive case data, AI as a complementary assistant with decisions remaining exclusively the judge's, and transparency about AI-generated content, drawing on UNESCO and Council of Europe frameworks.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 04 Apr 2025
- Current version
- Original (follows the Acuerdo of 6 March 2025 enabling generative-AI tools and Circular 19) · 04 Apr 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Users must independently verify every AI output.
- Sensitive case data must not be compromised.
- AI cannot replace judicial reasoning; decisions remain the judge's.
- The origin of AI-generated content should be transparent.
- Standards are subject to periodic review.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original (follows the Acuerdo of 6 March 2025 enabling generative-AI tools and Circular 19)current | 2025-04-04 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Circular No. 25: Good-practice guide for the use of generative AI in the Judiciary of Santa Fe" (Supreme Court of Justice of Santa Fe (Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Provincia de Santa Fe), Original (follows the Acuerdo of 6 March 2025 enabling generative-AI tools and Circular 19), 2025-04-04), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/ar-santa-fe-csj-circular-25-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI