Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Mandatory Certification Regarding Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge Brantley Starr)
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Judge Brantley Starr · Texas
last revised 2023-05-30last verified 2026-09-161 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
The first judge-specific generative AI order in the United States federal courts, issued by Judge Brantley Starr of the Northern District of Texas on 30 May 2023. Every attorney and self-represented litigant must certify either that no generative AI was used or that any AI-generated content was checked for accuracy by a human using print reporters or traditional databases.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 30 May 2023
- Current version
- Original · 30 May 2023
- Last verified
- 16 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Certificate required on the docket for every filer appearing before the judge.
- Filers must attest that no portion of a filing was drafted by generative AI, or that all AI output was human-verified.
- Verification must use print reporters or traditional legal databases.
- Filings without the certificate may be struck; false certification exposes the filer to sanctions.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2023-05-30 | First version recorded. | official |
Related court incidents on the record
- Mata v Avianca, Inc.2023-06-22 Sanctions
Read our analysis: US state and federal AI court instruments: what 268 require, September 2026 →
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Mandatory Certification Regarding Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge Brantley Starr)" (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Judge Brantley Starr, Original, 2023-05-30), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-nd-tex-starr-ai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)