Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
General Order 2025-04 on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas — Judge Randy Crane · Texas
last revised 2025-05-07last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCompetence
map categories:Self-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Southern District of Texas General Order 2025-04 is a district-wide caution about generative AI in court filings. It warns lawyers and pro se parties that AI content can be inaccurate, should not replace lawyer judgment, and will not excuse Rule 11 or ethics violations, but it does not impose a separate AI disclosure certificate.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 07 May 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- District-wide order cautions filers to check AI-assisted filings for factual and legal accuracy.
- The order reminds filers that Rule 11 responsibility remains with the signer.
- The order does not create a separate disclosure or certification form.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-05-07 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "General Order 2025-04 on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings" (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas — Judge Randy Crane, Original, 2025-05-07), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-txsd-court-2025-general-order-generative-ai-filings (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)