Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673
Supreme Court of Florida · Florida
last revised 2026-05-28last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Court ruleIn forceCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSanctions for AI misuse
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Florida moved from bar guidance to a binding filing rule. The Supreme Court amended Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515(d)(2) on 28 May 2026 to address generative AI tools in the representations a signer makes when filing a document, alongside conforming amendments to rules 2.505, 2.520 and 2.525.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- SC2026-0673 · 28 May 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Rule 2.515 retitled Signature and Representations to Court
- Rule 2.515(d)(2) (Representation by Signer) amended to require the signer to account for generative AI-produced content
- Signer representations include that the signer has read the document
- Conforming amendments to rules 2.505, 2.520 and 2.525
- Operative wording not yet retrieved; must be confirmed from the official opinion before publication
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| SC2026-0673current | 2026-05-28 | Amendment of rule 2.515(d)(2), rule retitled Signature and Representations to Court | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673" (Supreme Court of Florida, SC2026-0673, 2026-05-28), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-fl-rule-2-515-generative-ai-amendment (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- Alabama State Bar Formal Opinion 2026-01: Artificial Intelligence Use — Best Practices Under Existing Professional Conduct Rules · Alabama State Bar