Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)

Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research

U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut · Connecticut

last revised 2025-09-12last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →

GuidanceIn forceCompetence

map categories:Self-represented litigants

Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.

The District of Connecticut’s September 12, 2025 notice tells attorneys and pro se litigants to exercise great caution when submitting AI-generated language in filings. It warns that unverified AI output implicates Rule 11 and that briefing, AI-assisted or not, hallucinating legal propositions or misstating law will often result in sanctions.

Applies to
lawyers, litigants
Effective
See version history
Current version
Original · 12 Sept 2025
Last verified
06 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • Attorneys and pro se litigants should use great caution with AI-generated language.
  • Use of AI without verification implicates Rule 11.
  • The court has a no-tolerance policy for hallucinated legal propositions or severe misstatements of law.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Originalcurrent2025-09-12First version recorded.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research" (U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Original, 2025-09-12), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-ctd-court-2025-ai-assisted-research-notice (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in United States (federal)