Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Magistrate Judge Sean A. Camoni Page: Use of Generative AI
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania — Judge Sean A. Camoni · Pennsylvania
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Magistrate Judge Sean A. Camoni’s Middle District of Pennsylvania judge page requires any party, pro se or represented, using generative AI in preparing a document filed before him to include a Certificate of Use of Generative AI disclosing the tool, portions prepared by AI, and human checking of accuracy, citations, and legal authority.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Any party using generative AI to prepare a filed document before Judge Camoni must include a certificate.
- The certificate must disclose the specific AI tool used.
- The certificate must identify portions prepared by the AI program.
- The certificate must state that a person checked accuracy, citations, and legal authority.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Magistrate Judge Sean A. Camoni Page: Use of Generative AI" (U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania — Judge Sean A. Camoni, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-pamd-camoni-2026-genai-certificate (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)