Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Civil Standing Order for Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California — Judge Lisa J. Cisneros · California
last revised 2026-02-17last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceVerification duty
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros’s civil standing order states that parties may use lawful technological assistance, including AI tools, for research or drafting. Attorneys and unrepresented parties remain responsible for submissions, and failure to verify briefs and citations may lead to sanctions or striking.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 17 Feb 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Parties are not categorically prohibited from using lawful technological assistance, including AI.
- Attorneys and unrepresented parties must understand limitations of tools they use.
- The court imputes computer-based tool errors to the signer.
- Failure to verify briefs and citations may support sanctions or striking a filing.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-02-17 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Civil Standing Order for Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros" (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California — Judge Lisa J. Cisneros, Original, 2026-02-17), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cand-cisneros-2026-technological-assistance (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)