Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
People v. Zachariah C. Crabill, 23PDJ067 (Colo. O.P.D.J. 22 Nov 2023)
Colorado Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge · Colorado
last revised 2023-11-22last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forceVerification dutyCompetence
map categories:Sanctions for AI misuseDuty to verify AI outputTechnological competence
Colorado's Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Zachariah Crabill for one year and one day, with ninety days served, after he filed ChatGPT-generated citations without reading them, failed to correct the record and blamed a legal intern. Violations found of Colo. RPC 1.1, 1.3, 3.3(a)(1) and 8.4(c).
- Applies to
- lawyers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Stipulation to discipline · 22 Nov 2023
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Not reading or verifying AI-generated citations before filing violated Colo. RPC 1.1 and 1.3
- Failing to alert the court or withdraw the motion after discovering the citations were fictitious violated Colo. RPC 3.3(a)(1)
- Falsely attributing the errors to a legal intern violated Colo. RPC 8.4(c)
- Sanction: suspension of one year and one day, ninety days active, remainder stayed on two years' probation
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stipulation to disciplinecurrent | 2023-11-22 | Approved by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "People v. Zachariah C. Crabill, 23PDJ067 (Colo. O.P.D.J. 22 Nov 2023)" (Colorado Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, Stipulation to discipline, 2023-11-22), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-co-people-v-crabill-discipline (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court