Regulation Tracker · Official documents
Official documents on AI in legal practice, versioned
Every official text behind the map, with its current version, when it was last revised and when we last verified it against the official source. Unverified entries are the ones whose official copy could not be opened directly; they are listed but kept out of search indexes. Download as JSON (CC BY 4.0).
| Jurisdiction | Body | Document | Type | Last revised | Last verified | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Mahkamah Agung | Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal CodesClient data · Judges · Court AI | Policy | 2026-09-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IN | Supreme Court of India | Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v Union of India, 2026 INSC 947No AI deciding · Verify · Sanctions | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-09-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Lietuvos advokatūra | AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas]Training · Bar guidance | Policy | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of Japan | Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request)unverifiedCourt AI · Judges · No AI deciding | Policy | 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHER | Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB) | Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi]Bar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Competence · Supervision · Billing · Consumer AI · Training · Vendors · Disclosure · Sanctions | Guidance | 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Prime Minister of Vietnam | Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045AI statute | Policy | 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | SRA | Misuse of AI: Warning noticeVerify · Client data · Supervision · Competence · Bar guidance · Sanctions | Guidance | 2026-08-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEConnecticut | Connecticut Judicial Branch | Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final ReportJudges · Court AI · Evidence · Disclosure | Report | 2026-08-10 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | PERADI | Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan]unverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · No AI deciding · Training | Guidance | 2026-08-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IE | Irish High Court | Practice Direction HC 142: Responsible Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court DocumentsDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Sanctions · Supervision | Practice direction / note | 2026-07-29 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | EU | Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act)AI statute · Judges · Data protection · Evidence · Vendors | Statute | 2026-07-27(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| EU | EU | Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI)AI statute · Judges | Statute | 2026-07-24 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | Guidelines on the transparency obligations under Article 50 of the AI ActAI statute · Client consent · Evidence | Guidance | 2026-07-20(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Parliament (GR) | Law 5321/2026: measures for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and amendment of Law 4961/2022AI statute · Data protection | Statute | 2026-07-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IN | BCI | Bar Council of India circular on digital and social-media conduct and professional responsibility of advocatesunverifiedBar guidance · Evidence · Disclosure | Regulation | 2026-07-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| ZA | SA Judiciary Conference | 2026 Judiciary Conference Resolutions, Section 5 — Information Communication Technology, Digitisation and Artificial IntelligenceJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Training · Vendors · Client data | Policy | 2026-07-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Asamblea Nacional | Bill reforming the Organic Code of the Judicial Function to regulate AI use in judicial proceedingsunverifiedVerify · Sanctions · No AI deciding | Statute | 2026-07-13 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| INTL | UNCITRAL WG II | UNCITRAL Working Group II exploratory work on the use of AI in dispute resolutionArbitration | Consultation | 2026-07-10(+1) | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| OTHER | NAIO | Public Consultation: Proposed Artificial Intelligence (AI) Governance BillAI statute | Consultation | 2026-07-10 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| EU | EU AI Office | Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated ContentAI statute · Evidence | Guidance | 2026-07-09(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| CABritish Columbia | BC Provincial Court | Guidance on using AI to prepare for courtLitigants · Verify · Disclosure · Data protection | Guidance | 2026-07-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IN | Supreme Court of India | Pooja Ramesh Singh v Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd, 2026 INSC 668Verify · Sanctions · No AI deciding · Bar guidance | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-07-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Norwegian Supreme Court | Veiledning for advokater, section 19 'Bruk av KI-verktøy'Verify · Competence · Bar guidance · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2026-07-01(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| ZA | LSSA AI Committee | Revised Ethics Guidelines for Legal Practitioners in South Africa on the Use of Generative AIBar guidance · Verify · Competence · Client data | Guidance | 2026-07-01 | 2026-09-03 | Proposed |
| BRParana | TJPR | TJPR 9th Civil Chamber: 2% bad-faith fine and OAB referral for AI-fabricated STJ precedentunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-06-30 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | CJC | The Use of AI for the Preparation of Court Documents: Update on Consultation FindingsDisclosure · Verify | Report | 2026-06-30 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of Nepal | Judiciary Information and Communication Technology Policy, 2083 (2026)Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors · Training | Policy | 2026-06-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEConnecticut | Connecticut Judicial Branch | Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance | Court rule | 2026-06-23 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATERhode Island | RI Supreme Court | In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI GuidelinesBar guidance · Judges · Verify · Client data · Billing · Competence · Supervision · Evidence · Client consent | Court rule | 2026-06-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Comite de Etica FJ | Protocol for the use of artificial intelligence in the Judicial Function (Ethics Committee)unverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Disclosure · Client data · Court AI | Policy | 2026-06-16 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| BR | OAB | National Plan for Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Legal PracticeunverifiedBar guidance · Competence · Training | Policy | 2026-06-15 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | NRA | Amendments to the Collection of Rules of Advocates' Ethics and Dignity of the Profession introducing § 23e on technology and AIBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2026-06-13 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Consejo de Estado | Council of State, Third Section: parameters for AI use in proceedings and disciplinary referralunverifiedSanctions · Verify · No AI deciding | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-06-09 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FED | US Judicial Conference | Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707: Machine-Generated EvidenceEvidence | Court rule | 2026-06-04 | 2026-09-03 | Proposed |
| IN | Supreme Court of India | Draft Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence in Courts, 2026Disclosure · Judges · No AI deciding · Verify · Court AI · Litigants · Vendors · Training | Regulation | 2026-06-03 | 2026-09-03 | Consultation |
| US-STATEOhio | Ohio Board of Professional Conduct | Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial OfficersBar guidance · Judges · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Disclosure | Guidance | 2026-06-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Andmekaitse Inspektsioon | Artificial intelligence guidance hub [Tehisaru]Data protection · AI statute | Guidance | 2026-06-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | Law Society | Generative AI: the essentialsBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Guidance | 2026-06-01(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| UK | SRA | Effective supervision guidance (AI sections)unverifiedSupervision · Competence · Verify | Guidance | 2026-06-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NY Unified Court System | 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence TechnologyunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2026-06-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEFlorida | Florida Supreme Court | In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673unverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2026-05-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | Draft Commission Guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems (Article 6)AI statute · Judges | Guidance | 2026-05-19 | 2026-09-03 | Consultation |
| UK | BSB | Guidance on the use of Artificial Intelligence and Other TechnologiesBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-05-18 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| INTL | CoE | Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225)AI statute · Data protection · Evidence | Statute | 2026-05-15(+2) | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| AUVictoria | Supreme Court of Victoria | Practice Note SC GEN 25: The Use of Artificial Intelligence by Court UsersDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence | Practice direction / note | 2026-05-14 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AUVictoria | Supreme Court of Victoria | Judicial Guidelines on the Use of Artificial IntelligenceJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Verify | Guidance | 2026-05-14 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AU | FCFCOA | Practice Direction: Use of Artificial Intelligence (PD-AI)unverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2026-05-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATEAlabama | Alabama State Bar | Alabama State Bar Formal Opinion 2026-01: Artificial Intelligence Use — Best Practices Under Existing Professional Conduct RulesBar guidance · Disclosure · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision | Ethics opinion | 2026-05-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | NJPMC | National Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial InstitutionsunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Training · Data protection | Guidance | 2026-04-29 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | MoCDTI | Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025-2035unverifiedAI statute | Policy | 2026-04-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Corte Suprema | Supreme Court Rol 23.322-2025: suspension and fine for AI-fabricated doctrinal citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-04-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Judicial Yuan | Reference Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by the Judicial Yuan and Subordinate AgenciesunverifiedJudges · Verify · Court AI · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-04-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AU | Federal Court of Australia | Generative Artificial Intelligence Practice Note (GPN-AI)Disclosure · Verify · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2026-04-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BRSao Paulo | OAB/SP TED | OAB/SP Ethics and Discipline Tribunal ruling on partners' duty to supervise AI use (proc. 25.0886.2025.014989-0)unverifiedSupervision · Verify | Ethics opinion | 2026-04-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CGAE | CGAE Interpretive Circular 3/2026: use of generative AI systems and the duty of verificationVerify · Supervision · Competence · Bar guidance · Sanctions · Training | Ethics opinion | 2026-04-13 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| ZA | DCDT | Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy (published GN 3880 of 2026; withdrawn by Notice 3978 of 2026)AI statute · Sanctions | Policy | 2026-04-10(+1) | 2026-09-04 | Withdrawn |
| OTHER | CSM | CSM Recommendations on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial activity (Recomendacoes no uso de IA)Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Data protection · Training · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-04-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INPunjab, Haryana and Chandigarh | Punjab and Haryana High Court | Directive prohibiting judicial officers from using AI tools for judgments and legal researchunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding | Policy | 2026-04-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERNavarre | TSJ Navarra | TSJ Navarra, Social Chamber (Apr 2026): Art. 247 LEC proceedings archived after apology for AI-invented citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-04-04 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| SG | Law Society of Singapore | Advisory on the Use of Publicly Available AI ToolsBar guidance · Client data · Verify · Competence · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-04-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDFlorida | M.D. Fla. (Berger) | Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger)Disclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Standing order | 2026-04-02 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| INGujarat | Gujarat High Court | Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial and Court AdministrationJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Vendors · Training | Policy | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | JPDP | Guideline on Automated Decision-Making and Profiling (ADMP) under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010Data protection · Client consent · Vendors | Regulation | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| ZA | OCJ | Draft Policy on Artificial Intelligence for the Judiciary in South AfricaunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Client data · Vendors | Policy | 2026-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| EU | CCBE | CCBE Technical guide on the use of AI tools and models by lawyers (Edition 2026)Vendors · Client data · Competence · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2026-03-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IL | Israel Courts Administration | Ethical Code for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Judicial Authority (Courts Administration Procedure No. 01-26)unverifiedJudges · Court AI · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Disclosure · Supervision · Training · Vendors | Policy | 2026-03-26 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CNB | Guide pratique — La déontologie et l'intelligence artificielleunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Billing · Data protection | Guidance | 2026-03-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | ECRAI / Egypt NCAI | Guide to Egypt's National AI Governance Framework, Edition 2.0AI statute · Evidence · Data protection | Guidance | 2026-03-15 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATECalifornia | State Bar of California | Proposed amendments to Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.4, 1.6, 3.3, 5.1 and 5.3 related to artificial intelligence | Consultation | 2026-03-13 | 2026-09-03 | Proposed |
| INTL | LCIA | LCIA Arbitration Rules revision consultation (AI disclosure and guardrails)Arbitration · Disclosure | Consultation | 2026-03-11 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| OTHER | High Court of Kenya | High Court of Kenya rulings on AI-generated pleadings: Savla v Commission on Administrative Justice and the April 2026 set-asideunverifiedVerify · Litigants · Sanctions · Disclosure | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-03-06(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| SG | MinLaw | Guide for Using Generative AI in the Legal SectorBar guidance · Competence · Client data · Client consent · Supervision · Vendors · Evidence · Training | Guidance | 2026-03-06 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | TBMM AI Research Commission | Report of the Parliamentary Research Commission on Artificial Intelligence, Report No. 260unverifiedAI statute · Data protection | Report | 2026-03-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERCanary Islands | TSJ Canarias | TSJ Canarias, Criminal Chamber (Feb 2026): fine for 48 AI-fabricated Supreme Court citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-02-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Korea National Court Administration | AI Guidebook for JudgesunverifiedJudges · Verify · No AI deciding · Client data | Guidance | 2026-02-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| NZ | NZ Law Society | Generative AI guidance for lawyersBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Billing · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-02-24(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHERSicily | Trib. Siracusa | Tribunale di Siracusa, Sez. II civ., judgment no. 338/2026 (AI-hallucinated citations, Art. 96 c.p.c.)unverifiedVerify · Sanctions | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-02-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Kenyan Senate | The Artificial Intelligence Bill, 2026 (Senate Bills No. 4 of 2025)AI statute · Data protection | Statute | 2026-02-19 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHER | AEPD | AEPD Guidance on agentic AI from a data-protection perspective (Orientaciones sobre IA agentica)Data protection · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-02-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of the Philippines | A.M. No. 25-11-28-SC: Governance Framework on the Use of Human-Centered Augmented Intelligence in the JudiciaryDisclosure · Verify · Judges · No AI deciding · Litigants · Client data · Supervision · Court AI · Vendors · Training · Bar guidance | Court rule | 2026-02-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEOklahoma | Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals | Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Rule 1.17 — Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2026-02-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | CJC | Consultation: The Use of AI for the Preparation of Court DocumentsDisclosure · Verify | Consultation | 2026-02-17 | 2026-09-03 | Consultation |
| US-STATEIndiana | Indiana Supreme Court OJA | Indiana Supreme Court Office of Judicial Administration: trial-court AI policy toolkitunverifiedJudges · Court AI | Policy | 2026-02-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAOntario | Ontario Superior Court | The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Court Proceedings (consolidated civil, family and criminal practice directions)Verify · Disclosure · Litigants · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2026-02-12 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | TRG | Tribunal da Relacao de Guimaraes, 10 Feb 2026: six non-existent appellate rulings generated by AIunverifiedVerify · Sanctions | Judgment (guidance) | 2026-02-10 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | SRA | Compliance tips for solicitors on the use of AI and technologyBar guidance · Competence · Supervision · Client data · Verify · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-02-09(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| INTL | IBA ANLBS | Guidelines and Regulations to Provide Insights on Public Policies to Ensure AI's Beneficial Use as a Professional ToolBar guidance · Consumer AI | Report | 2026-02-01(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CGAE | CGAE White Paper on Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession (Libro Blanco sobre IA y Abogacia)unverifiedBar guidance · Training · Competence | Report | 2026-01-30 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CGPJ | CGPJ Instruction 2/2026 on the use of AI systems in judicial activity (Instruccion 2/2026)Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors · Training · Data protection | Regulation | 2026-01-30 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | CJEU | Artificial Intelligence Ethics CharterJudges · Court AI · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data | Policy | 2026-01-26(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Korea National Assembly | Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust (Law No. 20676)unverifiedAI statute · Client consent · Evidence | Statute | 2026-01-22(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Taiwan Legislative Yuan | Artificial Intelligence Basic Act (Taiwan)AI statute · Evidence · Vendors | Statute | 2026-01-14(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NSW Local Court | Practice Note: Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence | Practice direction / note | 2026-01-12 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | Law Society of NSW | A Solicitor's Guide to Responsible Use of Artificial IntelligenceBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors | Guidance | 2026-01-09 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEColorado | Colorado Supreme Court | Colorado Rule Change 2026(02): AI amendments to the Colorado Rules of Professional ConductBar guidance · Competence · Client data · Billing · Supervision · Verify | Court rule | 2026-01-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| GULFQatar | QICDRC | Practice Direction No. 1 of 2026 and Practice Guidance on the Use of Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2026-01-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NSW Personal Injury Commission | Procedural Direction PIC13: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Evidence · Client data | Practice direction / note | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CASaskatchewan | Saskatchewan King's Bench | General Application Practice Directive #12: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court SubmissionsVerify · Litigants · Competence · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEArizona | Arizona Supreme Court | Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 2.5, Comment 1: judicial technology competenceunverifiedJudges · Competence | Court rule | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEFlorida | FL 17th Judicial Circuit | Florida 17th Judicial Circuit Administrative Order 2026-03-GEN: Use of AI in Court FilingsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMontana | MT 13th Judicial District Court | Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court Local Rule 35 — Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2026-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUSouth Australia | SA Courts | Guidelines concerning the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in litigation in South Australian CourtsVerify · Litigants · Client data · Disclosure | Guidance | 2025-12-24 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NYC Bar | New York City Bar Formal Opinion 2025-6: Ethical Issues Affecting Use of AI to Record, Transcribe, and Summarize Conversations with ClientsBar guidance · Client data · Client consent · Verify | Ethics opinion | 2025-12-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | CEPEJ | Guidelines on the use of generative AI by courts and tribunals (CEPEJ(2025)18Final)Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Verify · Client data · Disclosure · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-12-19 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATEHawaii | Hawaii Supreme Court | Hawaii Supreme Court Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts: Final Report (SCMF-24-0000305)unverifiedDisclosure · Judges · Court AI · Verify | Report | 2025-12-16 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHER | Conseil d'État | Charte d'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle au sein de la juridiction administrativeJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Supervision | Policy | 2025-12-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | UNESCO | UNESCO Guidelines for the use of AI systems in courts and tribunalsJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors · Training · Verify | Guidance | 2025-12-03(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERBeijing | Tongzhou District Court | Beijing Tongzhou District People's Court: counsel criticised for filing AI-fabricated precedentsVerify · Sanctions · Litigants | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Ústavní soud | Ústavní soud, usnesení sp. zn. I. ÚS 3004/25 — procedural fine for a constitutional complaint citing non-existent decisionsSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Finnish Bar Association | B 05.2 Data Security Manual [Tietoturvaopas], Annex 5 'AI guide for the advocate' [Tekoälyopas asianajajalle]Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Bar guidance · Training · Vendors · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-12-01(+2) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| HK | HK Digital Policy Office | Hong Kong Generative AI Technical and Application GuidelineAI statute · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-12-01(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| HK | Law Society of Hong Kong | Circular 25-824: Generative AI in Legal Practice: Risks and TipsBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | NOvA | Aanbevelingen AI in de advocatuurBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NY UCS AI Advisory Committee | Ethical Considerations and Recommendations for the Use of AI by Judges and Judicial Staff (2025 Annual Report) | Report | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATEMassachusetts | Massachusetts SJC | Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Interim Guidelines for Use of Generative AIunverifiedJudges · Court AI · Client data | Guidance | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | Bar Council | Considerations when using ChatGPT and generative AI software based on large language modelsBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2025-11-25(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | KVKK | Generative AI and the Protection of Personal Data Guide, in 15 Questions (Üretken Yapay Zekâ ve Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Rehberi)Data protection · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-11-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEVirginia | Virginia State Bar | Legal Ethics Opinion 1901: Reasonable Fees and the Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedBilling · Bar guidance · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2025-11-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Drzavni zbor | Act implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on artificial intelligence (ZIUDHPUI)unverifiedAI statute · Data protection | Statute | 2025-11-21 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUWestern Australia | Supreme Court of WA | Guidelines for the use of generative AIVerify · Litigants · Client data · Evidence · Disclosure · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2025-11-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Corte Suprema | Acta 244-2025: Judicial Ethics Code (article 17 on responsible use of technology and AI)unverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI | Guidance | 2025-11-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IE | Law Society of Ireland | Use of Generative AI: Guidance for the Legal ProfessionBar guidance · Client data · Verify · Client consent · Competence · Supervision · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2025-11-12 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of the Philippines | A.M. No. 25-04-04-SC: The 2025 Code of Judicial Conduct and AccountabilityJudges · Verify · No AI deciding | Court rule | 2025-11-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CSJ Sala Civil | STC17832-2025: annulment of a judgment based on non-existent jurisprudential citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify · No AI deciding | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-11-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IN | MeitY | India AI Governance GuidelinesunverifiedAI statute · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-11-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERMadrid | ICAM | ICAM Guide of Good Practice for the use of AI in the legal profession (Guia ICAM IA 2025)Bar guidance · Client data · Client consent · Billing · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2025-10-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | UK Judiciary | Artificial Intelligence (AI): Judicial GuidanceJudges · No AI deciding · Client data · Verify · Court AI · Litigants | Guidance | 2025-10-31(+2) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMontana | MT 4th Judicial District Court | Montana Fourth Judicial District Court Rules of Practice, Rule 3.G — Pleading Requirements for Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2025-10-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMaryland | Appellate Court of Maryland | Mezu v. Mezu, No. 361, Sept. Term 2025 (Appellate Court of Maryland, reported, 29 Oct 2025)Sanctions · Verify · Supervision · Disclosure | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-10-29 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of the Philippines | A.M. No. 25-06-11-SC: The 2025 Code of Conduct and Accountability for Court Officials and PersonnelJudges · Verify · Court AI | Court rule | 2025-10-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEUtah | Utah Judicial Council | Utah Judicial Council Interim Rules on the Use of Generative AIJudges · Court AI · Vendors | Policy | 2025-10-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Congreso | Bill regulating artificial intelligence systems (Boletin 16821-19, merged with 15869-19)unverifiedAI statute | Statute | 2025-10-24(+1) | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| US-STATEIllinois | Illinois ARDC | ARDC: Implementing Generative AI for Illinois AttorneysBar guidance · Client data · Competence · Verify · Supervision · Client consent | Guidance | 2025-10-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDOhio | S.D. Ohio (Graham) | Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham)Disclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2025-10-21 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | CSJN | Acordada 10/2025: AI-generated plain-language summaries of judgments (LEX100)Court AI | Court rule | 2025-10-15 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CNF | CNF communication to local bars with model client notice on AI use (Art. 13 Law 132/2025)Client consent · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2025-10-13 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Malta (MDIA Act) | Artificial Intelligence Regulations, 2025 (Subsidiary Legislation 591.05)AI statute · Data protection | Regulation | 2025-10-10 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NY Unified Court System | Interim Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence | Policy | 2025-10-10 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| EU | CCBE | CCBE Guide on the use of generative AI by lawyersBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-10-02 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | House of Representatives | House Bill No. 3462 (20th Congress): creating the Philippine Artificial Intelligence CommissionAI statute | Statute | 2025-10-02 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHERRio Negro | STJ Rio Negro | Acordada 15/2024 and October 2025 extension: Protocol of Good Practice for Generative AI in the Judiciary of Rio NegroJudges · Verify · Sanctions · No AI deciding | Court rule | 2025-10-01(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATELouisiana | Louisiana Technology Commission | Louisiana Supreme Court Technology Commission: Generative Artificial Intelligence GuidelinesunverifiedJudges · Bar guidance · Client data · Verify · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-10-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CA | Federal Court of Canada | Interim Principles and Guidelines on the Court's Use of Artificial IntelligenceCourt AI · Judges · No AI deciding · Client data | Guidance | 2025-09-29 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Parliament (IT) | Law 23 September 2025 no. 132 on artificial intelligence (Legge 132/2025)Client consent · Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI · AI statute · Training · Vendors · Competence | Statute | 2025-09-25 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUQueensland | Supreme Court of Queensland | Practice Direction Number 5 of 2025: Accuracy of References in SubmissionsDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions · Litigants · Competence | Practice direction / note | 2025-09-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEIdaho | Idaho OAH | Idaho Office of Administrative Hearings: Guidelines for Administrative Law Judges Regarding the Use of Artificial IntelligenceJudges · Disclosure · Client data · Court AI · Evidence | Guidance | 2025-09-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | ÖRAK | Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) in Anwaltskanzleien — Leitfaden und Checkliste für KI-DienstleisterBar guidance · Vendors · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Training · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-09-23 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Congreso | Ley 31814: Law promoting the use of artificial intelligence for the country's economic and social developmentAI statute | Statute | 2025-09-09(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | Ciarb | Ciarb Guideline on the Use of AI in Arbitration (2025)Arbitration · Disclosure · Verify · Evidence · No AI deciding · Client data · Sanctions · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-09-05(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Advokatforeningen | Veiledning for bruk av kunstig intelligens i advokatvirksomhetunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-09-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAQuebec | Quebec Superior Court | Cadre de gouvernance en matière d'intelligence artificielle [Artificial Intelligence Governance Framework]unverifiedCourt AI · Judges · No AI deciding · Vendors | Policy | 2025-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATECalifornia | Judicial Council of California | California Rule of Court 10.430 and Standard 10.80: Generative AI use by courts | Court rule | 2025-09-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | JFBA | Points of Attention on the Use of Generative AI in Attorney Practice: Five Points for Appropriate UseunverifiedBar guidance · Client data · Verify · Client consent | Guidance | 2025-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Mexican federal collegiate court | Federal collegiate court criteria on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial decision-makingunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-08-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Judiciary of Kenya | Draft Judiciary Artificial Intelligence Policy and draft Practice Directions on AI use in courtsunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Judges · No AI deciding · Court AI | Policy | 2025-08-11 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| US-FED | DOJ EOIR | Policy Memorandum 25-40: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in EOIR ProceedingsBar guidance · Disclosure · Sanctions · Verify · Judges | Policy | 2025-08-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERSanta Fe | Camara Rosario | Camara de Apelacion en lo Civil y Comercial de Rosario, Sala II, Giacomino c/ Monserrat: AI-fabricated citationsunverifiedSanctions · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-08-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Ministère de la Justice | L'IA au service de la justice : stratégie et solutions opérationnellesunverifiedCourt AI · Judges · Training · Vendors | Report | 2025-08-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATELouisiana | Louisiana Legislature | Louisiana Act No. 250 of 2025: verification and disclosure of AI-generated or falsified evidence (La. C.C.P. art. 371)unverifiedEvidence · Disclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Statute | 2025-08-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FED | AO of the US Courts | Interim guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in the federal judiciaryJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors · Verify | Guidance | 2025-07-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INKerala | Kerala High Court | Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District JudiciaryunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Vendors | Policy | 2025-07-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | Guidelines on the scope of obligations for providers of general-purpose AI modelsAI statute · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-07-18 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| BR | CAM-CCBC | Orientacao Administrativa no 07/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in ArbitrationsArbitration | Guidance | 2025-07-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERCiudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires | CPACF | Guide for the use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers (Guia para el uso de Inteligencia Artificial para Abogados)Bar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Competence | Guidance | 2025-07-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | EU AI Office | General-Purpose AI Code of PracticeAI statute · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-07-10 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Malaysian Bar | Circular No. 242/2025: Updates on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Legal PracticeBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Vendors · Training · Consumer AI | Guidance | 2025-07-03 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEGeorgia | Judicial Council of Georgia | Judicial Council of Georgia Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts: ReportJudges · Disclosure · Court AI | Report | 2025-07-03 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Senate of the Philippines | Senate Bill No. 25 (20th Congress): An Act Regulating the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence SystemsAI statute | Statute | 2025-07-02 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHER | Swedish Bar Association | Vägledning om användning av generativ AI i advokatverksamhetBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2025-06-12(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMichigan | State Bar of Michigan | State Bar of Michigan AI Workgroup: Transforming the Legal Profession in the Age of AIunverifiedBar guidance · Competence · Consumer AI | Report | 2025-06-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | CEPEJ | Assessment Tool for the operationalisation of the European Ethical Charter on the use of AI in judicial systems (CEPEJ(2023)16)unverifiedCourt AI · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-06-05(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEArkansas | Arkansas Supreme Court | Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 25: Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedJudges · Client data · Court AI | Standing order | 2025-06-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEArkansas | Arkansas Supreme Court | In re Amendments to the Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct (AI amendments), 2025 Ark. 115unverifiedBar guidance · Supervision · Verify | Court rule | 2025-06-05 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Japan Diet | Act on the Promotion of Research, Development and Utilisation of AI-Related Technology (Law No. 53 of 2025)AI statute | Statute | 2025-06-04 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | STJ | STJ SLS 3.596: refusal to suspend AI petition-drafting platform Resolve JuizadounverifiedConsumer AI · Litigants | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-06-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Norwegian Ministry of Digitalisation | Høring — utkast til ny lov om kunstig intelligens (implementation of the EU AI Act in Norwegian law)unverifiedAI statute | Consultation | 2025-06-01 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| GULF | iGA (Bahrain) | General Policy for the Use of Artificial Intelligence, Version 1.0Court AI · Vendors · Data protection · No AI deciding · Training | Policy | 2025-05-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Denmark | Lov om supplerende bestemmelser til forordningen om kunstig intelligens (LOV nr 467 af 14/05/2025)AI statute · Court AI · Judges | Statute | 2025-05-14(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | AI literacy (Article 4 AI Act): Questions and answersunverifiedAI statute · Training · Competence | Guidance | 2025-05-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATEMaryland | MSBA | MSBA AI and Legal Technology Task Force: Ethical Considerations for Attorney Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedBar guidance · Client data · Billing · Competence · Verify · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-05-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IL | Israel Privacy Protection Authority | Draft Guidelines on the Application of the Privacy Protection Law to Artificial Intelligence SystemsunverifiedData protection · Client data · Vendors | Consultation | 2025-04-30 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| US-STATEAlaska | Alaska Bar Association | Alaska Bar Association Ethics Opinion 2025-1: Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of LawBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2025-04-23 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERJujuy | STJ Jujuy | Acordada 31/2025: Judicial Innovation Laboratory and Protocol for the use of AI in the Judiciary of JujuyJudges · Court AI | Court rule | 2025-04-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | VIAC | VIAC Note on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration ProceedingsArbitration · No AI deciding · Client data · Evidence · Competence · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-04-09 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Supreme Court of Pakistan | Ishfaq Ahmed v Mushtaq Ahmed, 2025 SCP 112 (PLD 2025 SC 582)unverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Court AI · Arbitration | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-04-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERSanta Fe | CSJ Santa Fe | Circular No. 25: Good-practice guide for the use of generative AI in the Judiciary of Santa FeJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI | Guidance | 2025-04-04 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | KIRP | AI w pracy radcy prawnego — Rekomendacje dotyczące korzystania przez radców prawnych z narzędzi opartych na sztucznej inteligencjiBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Billing · Vendors · Training · Data protection | Guidance | 2025-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| HK | PCPD | Checklist on Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI by EmployeesData protection · Client data · Supervision · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-03-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | SAK | Rules on the use of AI tools in advocacy practice (SAK Presidium Resolution 12/4/2025, as amended by 21/14/2025)Bar guidance · Client data · Verify · Client consent · Competence · Supervision · Training · Vendors · Billing | Regulation | 2025-03-31(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | MICDE | Kenya Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025-2030AI statute | Policy | 2025-03-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | NDPC | Nigeria Data Protection Act General Application and Implementation Directive (GAID) 2025 — Articles 43 and 44 (Emerging Technologies)Data protection · Vendors | Regulation | 2025-03-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CNDP (Morocco) | Communiqué de presse — IA et protection des données à caractère personnelData protection | Guidance | 2025-03-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NS Court of Appeal | AI Use in Appeal ProceedingsunverifiedVerify · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2025-03-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHERTuscany | Trib. Firenze | Tribunale di Firenze, Sezione Imprese, order of 14 March 2025 (ChatGPT-invented Cassazione citations)unverifiedVerify · Supervision · Sanctions | Judgment (guidance) | 2025-03-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | CNJ | Resolução CNJ nº 615/2025: Use of Artificial Intelligence in the JudiciaryJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors | Regulation | 2025-03-11 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NCAT | NCAT Procedural Direction 7: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI)Disclosure · Verify · Evidence · Client data · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2025-03-07 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CAC | Measures for Labelling AI-Generated and Synthesised ContentEvidence · AI statute | Regulation | 2025-03-07 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUWestern Australia | Supreme Court of WA | Artificial Intelligence practice direction: Consultation noteBar guidance · Verify · Judges | Consultation | 2025-03-03 | 2026-09-04 | Superseded |
| INTL | AAA-ICDR | AAA-ICDR Guidance on Arbitrators' Use of AI ToolsunverifiedArbitration · Verify · Client data · No AI deciding · Competence · Vendors | Guidance | 2025-03-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAAlberta | Law Society of Alberta | Gen AI Rules of Engagement for Canadian LawyersBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2025-03-01(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NS Supreme Court | Ensuring the Integrity of Court Submissions When Using Generative Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedVerify · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2025-02-28 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMichigan | State Bar of Michigan | State Bar of Michigan: AI FAQs for AttorneysunverifiedBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Guidance | 2025-02-11(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | European Commission | Commission Guidelines on prohibited artificial intelligence practices (Article 5 AI Act)AI statute | Guidance | 2025-02-04 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | OVB / Avocats.be | Richtlijnen voor advocaten voor het gebruik van Artificiële Intelligentie (OVB/Avocats.be guidelines on AI for lawyers)Bar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Client consent · Vendors · Supervision | Guidance | 2025-02-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Korea Judicial AI Research Group | Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary (Judicial AI Research Group)unverifiedDisclosure · Evidence · Judges | Report | 2025-02-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEOregon | Oregon State Bar | Oregon State Bar Formal Opinion 2025-205: Artificial Intelligence Tools | Ethics opinion | 2025-02-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATETexas | State Bar of Texas | Opinion 705: Generative Artificial Intelligenceunverified | Ethics opinion | 2025-02-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATEArizona | Arizona Supreme Court | Arizona Code of Judicial Administration 1-509: Use of Generative AI Technology and Large Language Models | Court rule | 2025-01-29(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NSW Supreme Court | Practice Note SC Gen 23: Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Evidence · Client data · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2025-01-28(+1) | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AU | OAIC | Guidance on privacy and the use of commercially available AI productsData protection · Vendors · Client data | Guidance | 2025-01-17(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Egypt NCAI | Egypt National Artificial Intelligence Strategy, Second Edition (2025-2030)Court AI · Judges | Policy | 2025-01-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Ministry of Justice (HR) | Rulebook on the anonymisation, publication and search of anonymised court decisions (NN 124/24)unverifiedCourt AI · Data protection | Regulation | 2025-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEColorado | Colorado Court of Appeals | Al-Hamim v. Star Hearthstone, LLC, 2024 COA 128 (Colo. Ct. App. 26 Dec 2024)Sanctions · Verify · Disclosure | Judgment (guidance) | 2024-12-26 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | NPC Philippines | NPC Advisory No. 2024-04: Application of the Data Privacy Act to AI Systems Processing Personal DataData protection · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-12-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | Illinois Supreme Court | Illinois Supreme Court Policy on Artificial Intelligence | Policy | 2024-12-18 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Danske Advokater | To nye AI-vejledninger til advokatbranchen (AI Act guidance and AI procurement guidance)unverifiedBar guidance · Vendors · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2024-12-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| EU | EDPB | Opinion 28/2024 on certain data protection aspects related to the processing of personal data in the context of AI modelsData protection · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-12-17 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CSJ | Acuerdo PCSJA24-12243: Guidelines for the respectful, responsible, safe and ethical use of AI in the Judicial BranchJudges · No AI deciding · Client data · Court AI · Training · Vendors | Regulation | 2024-12-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | Congresso Nacional | PL 2338/2023: Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence (Marco Legal da IA)AI statute | Statute | 2024-12-10(+1) | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| AU | VLSB+C / LS NSW / LPBWA | Statement on the use of artificial intelligence in Australian legal practiceBar guidance · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Billing | Guidance | 2024-12-06 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Estonian Bar Association | AI guide for advocates [Tehisaru juhend advokaatidele]unverifiedVerify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Bar guidance · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-12-03 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | BRAK | Hinweise zum Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz (KI)Bar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors · AI statute · Training | Guidance | 2024-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAOntario | Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure | Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 4.06.1(2.1) and (2.2): Certification of authenticity of authorities (O. Reg. 384/24)unverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2024-12-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AUNew South Wales | NSW Chief Justice | Guidelines for New South Wales Judges in respect of use of Generative AIJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Supervision · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-11-21 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEArizona | Arizona AI Steering Committee | Arizona Steering Committee on AI and the Courts: Generative AI — Ethical Best Practices for Lawyers and JudgesunverifiedBar guidance · Judges · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Client consent | Guidance | 2024-11-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMississippi | Mississippi Bar | Mississippi Bar Ethics Opinion No. 267: lawyers' use of generative artificial intelligenceunverifiedBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2024-11-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | OAB | Recomendacao no 001/2024: Responsible Use of Generative AI in Legal PracticeunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Competence | Guidance | 2024-11-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | ANPD | ANPD call for input on Artificial Intelligence and Review of Automated Decisions (LGPD art. 20)Data protection | Consultation | 2024-11-06 | 2026-09-04 | Consultation |
| US-STATENorth Carolina | North Carolina State Bar | 2024 Formal Ethics Opinion 1: Use of Artificial Intelligence in a Law Practiceunverified | Ethics opinion | 2024-11-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| CAQuebec | Barreau du Québec | L'intelligence artificielle générative: Guide pratique pour une utilisation responsableBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-10-25 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEDelaware | Delaware Supreme Court | Interim Policy on the Use of Generative AI by Judicial Officers and Court Personnel | Policy | 2024-10-21 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| INTL | SCC | SCC Guide to the use of artificial intelligence in cases administered under the SCC RulesArbitration · No AI deciding · Evidence · Vendors · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-10-16 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NS Registrar in Bankruptcy | Artificial Intelligence Directive, Registrar in BankruptcyunverifiedDisclosure | Practice direction / note | 2024-10-04 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEIllinois | IL 22nd Judicial Circuit | Illinois 22nd Judicial Circuit (McHenry County) Administrative Order 2024-23: Artificial Intelligence Policy and PlanunverifiedDisclosure · Judges · Court AI | Standing order | 2024-10-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew Mexico | State Bar of New Mexico | Formal Ethics Advisory Opinion 2024-004: Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of LawBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Billing · Competence · Supervision | Ethics opinion | 2024-09-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| SG | Singapore Courts | Registrar's Circular No. 1 of 2024: Guide on the Use of Generative AI Tools by Court UsersDisclosure · Verify · Litigants · Evidence · Sanctions | Practice direction / note | 2024-09-23 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | IBA/CAIDP | The Future is Now: Artificial Intelligence and the Legal ProfessionBar guidance · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Training | Report | 2024-09-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | AAIP | Guide for public and private entities on transparency and personal-data protection for responsible AIunverifiedData protection | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CA | CJC | Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Canadian CourtsunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Training | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CNB | Guide pratique — Utilisation des systèmes d'intelligence artificielle générativeBar guidance · Competence · Verify · Vendors · Training | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | MOSTI | National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics (AIGE)AI statute | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMinnesota | Minnesota OLPR | Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility: ethics guidance for generative AI useunverifiedBar guidance · Client data · Verify · Competence · Client consent | Guidance | 2024-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | NBA-SLP | Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession in NigeriaBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision · Client consent · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-08-28(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | SIC | Circular Externa 002 de 2024: Guidelines on the processing of personal data in AI systemsunverifiedData protection | Regulation | 2024-08-21 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew York | NYC Bar | New York City Bar Formal Opinion 2024-5: Generative Artificial Intelligenceunverified | Ethics opinion | 2024-08-07 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Corte Constitucional | Sentencia T-323 de 2024: due process and judges' use of generative AI (ChatGPT)unverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Verify | Judgment (guidance) | 2024-08-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | FMCIDE / NITDA-NCAIR | National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (NAIS), August 2024AI statute | Policy | 2024-08-01 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| GULF | UAE AI Office | The UAE Charter for the Development and Use of Artificial IntelligenceAI statute · Court AI · Data protection | Policy | 2024-07-30 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FED | ABA | ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence ToolsBar guidance · Competence · Client data · Client consent · Verify · Supervision · Billing · Vendors | Ethics opinion | 2024-07-29 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AUQueensland | Supreme Court of Queensland | Practice Direction Number 14 of 2024: Expert evidence in criminal proceedings (other than sentences)Evidence · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2024-07-15 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| HK | Hong Kong Judiciary | Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI for Judges, Judicial Officers and Support StaffJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-07-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATEMinnesota | Minnesota State Bar Association | Minnesota State Bar Association AI Working Group: Final Report and RecommendationsunverifiedBar guidance · Competence · Client data | Report | 2024-07-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMissouri | MO 7th Judicial Circuit | Missouri 7th Judicial Circuit (Clay County) Local Rule 3.3.1: Disclosure of Artificial Intelligence UseunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2024-07-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | TBMM | Artificial Intelligence Bill [Yapay Zekâ Kanunu Teklifi]AI statute | Statute | 2024-06-25 | 2026-09-04 | Proposed |
| OTHER | SAV/FSA | SAV-Wegleitung für den Umgang mit künstlicher IntelligenzBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Vendors · Supervision · AI statute | Guidance | 2024-06-14(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | JAMS | JAMS Rules Governing Disputes Involving Artificial Intelligence SystemsArbitration · Evidence | Court rule | 2024-06-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEKansas | Shawnee County District Court | Shawnee County District Court Rule 3.125: Pleadings Using Generative Artificial IntelligenceDisclosure · Verify · Sanctions | Court rule | 2024-06-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEWest Virginia | WV Lawyer Disciplinary Board | Legal Ethics Opinion 24-01: Artificial IntelligenceBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Billing · Competence · Supervision · Disclosure | Ethics opinion | 2024-06-14 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| HK | PCPD | Artificial Intelligence: Model Personal Data Protection FrameworkData protection · Vendors · Client data | Guidance | 2024-06-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IE | Judicial Council of Ireland | Guidelines for Judges: The Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceJudges · No AI deciding · Verify · Client data · Court AI | Guidance | 2024-06-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-FED | Fifth Circuit | Proposed amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 (generative AI certification)Disclosure · Verify | Court rule | 2024-06-01 | 2026-09-03 | Withdrawn |
| AUQueensland | QLS | Guidance Statement No. 37: Artificial Intelligence in Legal PracticeBar guidance · Competence · Client data · Verify · Supervision · Vendors · Client consent | Guidance | 2024-05-31 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEPennsylvania | PBA and Philadelphia Bar | Joint Formal Opinion 2024-200: Ethical Issues Regarding the Use of Artificial IntelligenceBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Billing · Competence · Client consent | Ethics opinion | 2024-05-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATENew Hampshire | NH Bar Association | Ethics of Using Artificial Intelligence in Practice (NHBA Ethics Corner)Bar guidance · Client data · Verify · Competence | Guidance | 2024-05-15 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CA | Federal Court of Canada | Notice to the Parties and the Profession: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court ProceedingsDisclosure · Verify | Practice direction / note | 2024-05-07(+1) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| IL | Israel Bar National Ethics Committee | Preliminary Opinion on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Lawyers' Work, decision At/60/24unverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Client consent · Competence · Disclosure · Vendors | Ethics opinion | 2024-05-07 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | DSK | Orientierungshilfe: Künstliche Intelligenz und DatenschutzData protection · No AI deciding · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-05-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | OECD | OECD Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449)AI statute | Policy | 2024-05-03(+2) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUQueensland | Queensland Courts | The use of generative AI: guidelines for judicial officersunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI | Guidance | 2024-05-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| AUQueensland | Queensland Courts | The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Guidelines for Responsible Use by Non-LawyersLitigants · Verify · Client data | Guidance | 2024-05-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| AUVictoria | Supreme Court of Victoria | Guidelines for Litigants: Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in LitigationLitigants · Verify · Disclosure | Guidance | 2024-05-01 | 2026-09-03 | Superseded |
| INTL | SVAMC | SVAMC Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Arbitration (First Edition)Arbitration · Disclosure · Verify · Client data · Evidence · No AI deciding · Competence | Guidance | 2024-04-30 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMissouri | Missouri OLEC | Missouri Informal Opinion 2024-11: lawyer's use of generative artificial intelligenceBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Disclosure | Ethics opinion | 2024-04-25 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FED | USPTO | Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the USPTOunverifiedVerify · Client data · Competence · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2024-04-11 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| CAManitoba | Law Society of Manitoba | Generative Artificial Intelligence: Guideline for Use in the Practice of LawunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision | Guidance | 2024-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAOntario | LSO | White Paper: Licensee Use of Generative Artificial IntelligenceBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision | Guidance | 2024-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEDistrict of Columbia | D.C. Bar | D.C. Bar Legal Ethics Opinion 388: Attorneys' Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Client MattersBar guidance · Billing · Client data · Verify · Competence · Supervision · Disclosure | Ethics opinion | 2024-04-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEKentucky | Kentucky Bar Association | KBA E-457: The Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law | Ethics opinion | 2024-03-15 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| SG | PDPC | Advisory Guidelines on Use of Personal Data in AI Recommendation and Decision SystemsData protection · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-03-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CASaskatchewan | Law Society of Saskatchewan | Guidelines for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of LawunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence · Supervision | Guidance | 2024-02-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | CEPEJ | Information note on the use of generative AI by judicial professionalsJudges · Verify · Client data · Court AI · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2024-02-01 | 2026-09-03 | Superseded |
| US-STATEConnecticut | Connecticut Judicial Branch | Responsible AI Policy Framework v2.1 | Policy | 2024-02-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATENew Jersey | New Jersey Supreme Court | Preliminary Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence by New Jersey Lawyersunverified | Guidance | 2024-01-24 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-STATELouisiana | Louisiana Supreme Court | Louisiana Supreme Court letter to the Louisiana State Bar Association on the emergence of artificial intelligenceBar guidance · Judges · Disclosure · Client data · Verify · Competence | Guidance | 2024-01-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEFlorida | Florida Bar | Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 24-1: Lawyers' use of generative artificial intelligence | Ethics opinion | 2024-01-19 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| GULF | SDAIA | Generative Artificial Intelligence Guidelines for GovernmentunverifiedCourt AI · Verify · Client data · Vendors | Guidance | 2024-01-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| GULF | SDAIA | Generative Artificial Intelligence Guidelines for the PublicunverifiedVerify · AI statute · Litigants | Guidance | 2024-01-11 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Finnish Bar Association | B 05.1 Data Security Guideline [Tietoturvaohje]Client data · Competence · Client consent · Vendors · Training | Regulation | 2024-01-01(+2) | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| GULFDubai International Financial Centre | DIFC Courts | Practical Guidance Note No. 2 of 2023: large language models and generative AI in DIFC Courts proceedingsDisclosure · Verify · Evidence · Client data · Bar guidance | Guidance | 2023-12-21 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Gobierno de Espana | Royal Decree-Law 6/2023: automated, proactive and assisted actions in the Administration of JusticeCourt AI · No AI deciding | Statute | 2023-12-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Komdigi | Circular Letter No. 9 of 2023 on Artificial Intelligence Ethics [SE Menkominfo No. 9/2023 Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial]AI statute · Data protection | Policy | 2023-12-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| NZ | Courts of New Zealand | Guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in Courts and TribunalsJudges · Verify · Client data · Litigants · Evidence · Court AI · Supervision · Disclosure | Guidance | 2023-12-07 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NSBS | Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law: What is AI and can or should I use it in my practice?unverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2023-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | CCJE | CCJE Opinion No. 26 (2023): Moving forward - the use of assistive technology in the judiciaryJudges · No AI deciding · Training | Guidance | 2023-12-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Bar Council Malaysia | Circular No. 342/2023: Risks and Precautions in Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Legal ProfessionBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2023-11-24 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEColorado | Colorado OPDJ | People v. Zachariah C. Crabill, 23PDJ067 (Colo. O.P.D.J. 22 Nov 2023)Sanctions · Verify · Competence | Judgment (guidance) | 2023-11-22 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATECalifornia | State Bar of California | Practical Guidance for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law | Guidance | 2023-11-16 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| CABritish Columbia | LSBC | Guidance on Professional Responsibility and Generative AIBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2023-11-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| UK | SRA | Risk Outlook report: The use of artificial intelligence in the legal marketunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data | Report | 2023-11-01 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| CANova Scotia | NS Provincial Court | Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Protecting the Integrity of Court Submissions in Provincial CourtunverifiedDisclosure · Verify · Litigants | Practice direction / note | 2023-10-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEMichigan | State Bar of Michigan | State Bar of Michigan Judicial Ethics Opinion JI-155: judicial use of artificial intelligenceunverifiedJudges · Competence · Court AI | Ethics opinion | 2023-10-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-STATEWest Virginia | WV Judicial Investigation Commission | JIC Advisory Opinion 2023-22 (judicial use of artificial intelligence)Judges · Verify · Client data | Ethics opinion | 2023-10-13 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANewfoundland and Labrador | NL Supreme Court | Notice to the Profession and General Public: Ensuring the Integrity of Court Submissions when Using Large Language ModelsunverifiedVerify · Litigants · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2023-10-12 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAAlberta | Alberta Courts | Notice to the Profession and Public: Ensuring the Integrity of Court Submissions When Using Large Language ModelsVerify · Litigants · Disclosure | Practice direction / note | 2023-10-06 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| NZ | NZ Privacy Commissioner | Artificial Intelligence and the Information Privacy PrinciplesData protection · Vendors · Client data | Guidance | 2023-09-21 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | ČAK | Stanovisko k užívání umělé inteligence (AI) při poskytování právních služebBar guidance · Client data · Client consent · Verify · Consumer AI | Ethics opinion | 2023-09-20 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| GULFDubai International Financial Centre | DIFC Commissioner of Data Protection | DIFC Data Protection Regulations, Regulation 10 — Processing Personal Data through Autonomous and Semi-autonomous SystemsData protection · Vendors · AI statute | Regulation | 2023-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| GULF | SDAIA | AI Ethics PrinciplesunverifiedAI statute · Data protection · Court AI | Policy | 2023-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Judicial Yuan | Judicial Yuan statement on generative-AI judgment drafting for criminal casesCourt AI · No AI deciding · Judges | Policy | 2023-08-27 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | Japan MoJ | Relationship between AI-based contract-drafting, review and management support services and Article 72 of the Attorney ActConsumer AI | Guidance | 2023-08-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | CAC | Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence ServicesAI statute · Data protection | Regulation | 2023-07-10 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAYukon | Supreme Court of Yukon | Practice Direction GENERAL-29: Use of Artificial Intelligence ToolsDisclosure | Practice direction / note | 2023-06-26 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CAManitoba | Manitoba King's Bench | Practice Direction: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court SubmissionsDisclosure | Practice direction / note | 2023-06-23 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDPennsylvania | E.D. Pa. (Baylson) | Standing Order Re: Artificial Intelligence in Cases Assigned to Judge BaylsonDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2023-06-06 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Japan PPC | Alert on the use of generative AI servicesData protection · Client data | Guidance | 2023-06-02 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| US-FEDIllinois | N.D. Ill. (Fuentes) | Standing Order for Civil Cases (generative AI provision), Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. FuentesunverifiedDisclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2023-05-31 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| US-FEDTexas | N.D. Tex. (Starr) | Mandatory Certification Regarding Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge Brantley Starr)Disclosure · Verify | Standing order | 2023-05-30 | 2026-09-03 | In force |
| OTHER | Egypt NCAI / MCIT | Egyptian Charter for Responsible AI, 2023 v1.0AI statute | Guidance | 2023-04-19 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| CANewfoundland and Labrador | LSNL | Artificial Intelligence in Your PracticeunverifiedBar guidance · Verify · Client data · Competence | Guidance | 2023-02-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| INTL | UNESCO | UNESCO Global Toolkit on AI and the Rule of Law for the JudiciaryunverifiedTraining · Judges | Guidance | 2023-01-01 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| OTHER | SPC | Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial FieldJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors | Policy | 2022-12-08 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| HK | PCPD | Guidance on the Ethical Development and Use of Artificial IntelligenceunverifiedData protection · Vendors | Guidance | 2021-08-18 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
| BR | CNJ | Resolucao CNJ no 332/2020: Ethics, Transparency and Governance in the Production and Use of AI in the JudiciaryunverifiedJudges · No AI deciding · Court AI · Vendors | Regulation | 2020-08-21 | 2026-09-04 | Superseded |
| INTL | CEPEJ | European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environmentJudges · Court AI · No AI deciding · Vendors | Guidance | 2018-12-04 | 2026-09-04 | In force |
IN
UK
US-STATE
IE
EU
ZA
INTL
CA
BR
AU
SG
IL
NZ
GULF
HKMissing a document, or a newer version? Tell us. Entries are checked against the official publication; the ones we could not open directly are marked unverified until they are.