Topic
Judicial guidance, AI evidence, deepfakes, and standing orders across jurisdictions.
Briefs·Guidance diffWhat changed
What changed when the State Bar of California replaced its November 2023 generative-AI guidance with the 2026 revision covering agentic AI.
News·News brief
Florida's Fourth District ordered counsel to explain suspected AI-generated filings in a family-law writ case, with possible sanctions or bar referral.
Briefs·Weekly briefingIssue
Issue 2: the SDT's first AI-citation case, 476 US court rows on record, California SB 574 with the Governor, Germany, Poland and Ireland AI Act laws.
News·News brief
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal struck Abhishek Kumar off the register after AI-generated false citations appeared in his defence to SRA proceedings.
News·News brief
Passed 31 Aug and enrolled 4 Sep 2026, SB 574 would bar delegating law practice to AI, require citation checks and court disclosure, and bind arbitrators.
Research·Report
41 verified US bills and laws as of 7 Sep 2026: 10 in force, 23 pending, 8 not advanced, with court and legal-practice duties.
Research·Report
As of 8 Sep 2026, 566 US court documents on generative AI and related AI questions show 507 fabricated-citation rulings.
Research·Report
595 official justice-sector AI records in 17 jurisdiction codes: 351 DOJ rows, 98 Brazil rows and 31 Netherlands rows as of 7 September 2026.
Research·Report
17 rulings and opinions on AI privilege, discovery and AI-generated evidence, 2024 to 2026, coded by question, plus what five note-taker vendors say they keep.
Research·Comparison
46 binding court instruments and 130 country records on one schema: 6 countries bind filers to disclose or certify, 10 to verify, most say nothing.
Research·Report
150 tracker rows, 45 with a stated figure: USD 371,542 across 34 US orders, median USD 5,000; 48 regulator referrals, 5 verified dispositions.
Research·Report
12 consumer legal-AI services on one schema, 41 self-represented rows in the incident tracker, two docket studies of AI pro se filings, and the regulators.
Research·Report
106 instruments on judges' AI use and 11 decisions where an adjudicator relied on fabricated authority: 10 countries bind judges, 22 guide, 6 are drafting.
Research·Report
India searches 'legal ai' 8,100 times a month against 9,900 in the US; its courts have acted on eight matters built on fake authority; its rulebook is in draft.
Research·Report
48 matters before regulators in 7 countries: 5 dispositions verified from the regulator's own document (7 rows), 4 reported, 36 open; the fastest took 104 days.
Research·Report
A dataset-first report on AI rules for lawyers and courts across 130 records, with provisional countries separated from checked counts.
News·News brief
The D.C. Court of Appeals struck a Deutsche Bank appellee brief after counsel used Google's generative AI search tool without verifying four nonexistent cases.
News·News brief
The Supreme Court of India set aside a Rs 425.28 crore customs penalty after finding fake or misused AI-generated authorities in the order.
News·News brief
A 2 September 2026 Mahkamah Agung letter circulates draft criminal-code judgment templates and bars uploading the drafts to AI services.
Research·Analysis
A C.D. Cal. Special Master sanctioned Ellis George and K&L Gates $31,100 after an AI-drafted brief cited fake cases and was re-filed without disclosure.
News·News brief
The Virginia Court of Appeals ordered counsel to take AI or appellate-practice CLE after an appellee brief attributed 25 phantom quotations to Virginia cases.
Briefs·Explainer
The regulation map records 39 country answers on judicial AI use: binding rules, guidance, proposals and one case-law answer.
Briefs·Explainer
Across 130 country records, 50 have a binding, guidance, proposed or case-law answer on verification of AI output.
Research·Analysis
Sullivan & Cromwell disclosed AI-hallucinated citations in a Chapter 15 emergency motion in April 2026. The letter, the 28-citation count, and the docket since.
Research·Report
1 July to 3 September 2026: 54 tracker incidents in 11 jurisdictions, USD 132,888 in stated US penalties, 20 rows with a regulator referral or disposition.
Research·Analysis
Summer 2026 reviewed: the SRA's AI warning notice, Ireland's mandatory AI declaration in civil filings and the EU's deferred high-risk AI Act duties.
Briefs·Weekly briefingIssue
Issue 1: 50 incidents added, the SRA's misuse-of-AI warning notice, Ireland's Practice Direction HC 142, deferred EU high-risk duties, 128 tools on record.
Briefs·Guidance diffWhat changed
Australian regulator guidance on generative AI — Queensland's Guidance Statement 37, the three-regulator joint statement, and the NSW solicitor's guide.
Research·Analysis
England's Divisional Court referred two lawyers to their regulators over AI-fabricated citations and warned its restraint on contempt is not a precedent.
Briefs·Guidance diffWhat changed
The version record of Canadian law-society generative-AI guidance — LSBC (2023), the LSO white paper (2024), Alberta's Rules of Engagement, and the CBA toolkit.
Research·Analysis
Oregon's ~$110,000 AI-sanctions case: terminating sanctions for fifteen fake cases and eight fabricated quotations, and why the headline figure is an aggregate.
Research·Analysis
The first reported UK case of AI-invented case law: a litigant cited nine ChatGPT-fabricated decisions to the Tax Tribunal, which found them fake.
Briefs·Guidance diffWhat changed
The Law Society of Ireland's GenAI guidelines, the Judicial Council's guidelines for judges, and the Court of Appeal's five principles — dated and sourced.
Research·Analysis
An Ontario lawyer filed a ChatGPT-fabricated factum, then lied about writing it — and drew a criminal-contempt referral to the Attorney General.
Briefs·Explainer
Plain-English definitions courts use when sanctioning AI-fabricated citations: hallucination, Hamid jurisdiction, wasted costs, Rule 11, and more.
News·Roundup
The judgments, court rules, regulator guidance, and research worth reading first on AI in legal practice — annotated and grouped by who needs them.
Research·Analysis
India's Supreme Court set aside two tribunal orders built on fake AI-generated precedents and ordered the Bar Council to frame AI rules for lawyers.
Briefs·Guidance diffWhat changed
Singapore's legal AI guidance, dated and sourced: the Supreme Court's 2024 circular, the Ministry of Law's 2026 sector guide, and the Law Society advisory.
Research·Analysis
South Africa's Legal Practice Council has published no guidance on lawyers' AI use — so its courts are referring practitioners to it instead, case by case.
Research·Report
From Mata v Avianca to a $110,000 Oregon sanction: what the verified record of AI-fabricated citations shows about courts, regulators, and the firms involved.
Briefs·Guidance diffWhat changed
AI guidance in India (Kerala), Brazil (CNJ Res. 615), Hong Kong, and the Gulf (QFC) — judicial and regulator documents beyond the big jurisdictions.
Briefs·Guidance diffWhat changed
How the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary's AI guidance for judges in England and Wales changed across three versions: Dec 2023, April 2025, and 31 October 2025.
Research·Report
As of 16 Sep 2026, 268 US court AI instruments show certification, disclosure, verification and no-disclosure policies.
Briefs·Explainer
New South Wales runs the strictest AI court rule in the common-law world: affidavits must declare AI was NOT used. Here is what the practice note requires.
