Skip to content

Courts on AI / monthly digest

What courts said about AI in March 2025

1 court-authored documents filed this month that substantively discuss generative AI. Substantive AI law courts cite 1.

compiled by the SafeLegalAI editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-08v0.2.2coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub

← February 2025 · June 2025 →

  1. Thaler v. Perlmutter

    · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit · Substantive AI law courts cite

    The D.C. Circuit holds that the Copyright Act requires human authorship and affirms the Copyright Office’s refusal to register a work listing Thaler’s Creativity Machine as sole author. The opinion frames AI authorship as a statutory question.