Marshall v. Regal Waters Holdings Pty Ltd

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal · QLD · Australia · 2025-07-22 · [2025] QCAT 289

No weight givenAcknowledged AI output tenderedchat-outputoffered by applicantchallenge: weight

Homeowners cited a Google AI response about rent assistance and housing stress in a community-title dispute. QCAT held the generated statements were unverified, unattributed, and untested, assigned no probative value, and rejected the alternative calculation for lack of credible evidence.

The court's finding, in its words

Unverified, unattributed and untested statements generated by Google’s AI applications have no probative value.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: austlii.edu.au · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC0)
Notes: AustLII live page blocked automated reading; quote and coding came from lead excerpt. Publication-ban status not confirmed.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub