Yang v. Gibbs

British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal · BC · Canada · 2024-06-27 · 2024 BCCRT 613 · SC-2023-005421

No weight givenAcknowledged AI output tenderedchat-outputoffered by applicantchallenge: weight

Applicants submitted ChatGPT evidence in a fencing dispute. The CRT noted warnings about AI accuracy and prior decisions declining to rely on ChatGPT research, gave the generated material no weight, and decided the claim using ordinary evidence about the contract and work.

The court's finding, in its words

Information provided by ChatGPT is unreliable at best.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: damiencharlotin.com · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC0)
Notes: Official CRT item URL not located; downloaded lead PDF copy was read and publication-ban status not confirmed.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub