Agyeman v. Hosseinzadmoghadasi

British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal · BC · Canada · 2025-09-15 · 2025 BCCRT 1278 · SC-2024-005378

No weight givenAcknowledged AI output tendereddocumentoffered by applicantchallenge: weight

A driving-school claimant submitted an AI-generated overview of insurance policies. The CRT held the document was not expert evidence or a business record, did not prove facts, was not reliable evidence, and did not consider it when deciding the small claim.

The court's finding, in its words

The document was not written by an expert and is not a business record.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: damiencharlotin.com · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC0)
Notes: Official CRT item URL not located; downloaded lead PDF copy was read and publication-ban status not confirmed.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub