R. v. Vitellaro

Ontario Court of Justice · ON · Canada · 2025-04-11 · 2025 ONCJ 200

AdmittedAlleged deepfakevideooffered by prosecutionchallenge: authenticity

Vitellaro alleged a police booking-cell video was altered and called it a CGI deepfake. In court, the parties compared three USB copies, including the alleged original, and the judge inspected the footage, found the copies consistent, and rejected the authenticity challenge.

Rules cited: Canada Evidence Act s.31.1

The court's finding, in its words

Three USB copies were compared and found consistent; the CGI deepfake allegation did not displace admission.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: canlii.org
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin deepfakes lead CSV (CC0), User brief named-case list
Notes: CanLII page could not be independently read by script; downloaded lead PDF copy was read.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub