Salvador Espitia Chavez v. Salud Total

Constitutional Court of Colombia · Colombia · 2023-01-01

OtherAcknowledged AI output tendereddocumentoffered by courtchallenge: nonesensitive matter — ruling only

A Colombian court decision disclosed or was reported to include ChatGPT-assisted drafting about health-care exemptions for a minor with disabilities. The row captures judicial use of AI in preparing legal reasoning rather than a contested evidentiary exhibit.

The court's finding, in its words

The court clerk used ChatGPT prompts for legal background and drafting, not party-proffered evidence.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: damiencharlotin.com · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC0)
Notes: Downloaded lead PDF copy read; no official Colombian source or publication-ban status confirmed.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub