n° 25/01677

Cour d'appel de Rouen · France · 2026-02-11 · 25/01677

No weight givenAcknowledged AI output tenderedexpert-reportoffered by plaintiffchallenge: weight

Counsel offered AI-assisted material about rainfall patterns in a French civil appeal. The court preferred conventional expert or evidentiary material and did not treat the AI output as probative proof. The public court page required JavaScript, so the row remains lightly verified.

The court's finding, in its words

The court preferred non-AI expert evidence over AI-assisted assertions about rain patterns.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: courdecassation.fr · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · official page read, document not retrievedprovisional
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC0)
Notes: Court page showed a JavaScript redirect to the reader; no full primary text was accessible through fetch and publication-ban status not confirmed.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub