L.H.S. v. Clal Insurance Co.

Magistrate Court of Israel · Israel · 2024-12-09

ExcludedAI-generated material submitteddocumentoffered by defendantchallenge: admissibilitysensitive matter — ruling only

An insurer sent a court-appointed medical expert a DigitalOwl AI summary and highlighted medical records. The court treated the processed content as risking influence on the neutral expert, ordered clean unmarked records resent, and denied costs because the issue was novel.

The court's finding, in its words

The expert was ordered to disregard the AI-generated summary and marked medical documents.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: damiencharlotin.com
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC0), User brief named-case list
Notes: Hebrew PDF copy read; no official source or publication-ban status confirmed.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub