Jaswinder Singh v. State of Punjab

Punjab and Haryana High Court · Punjab · India · 2023-03-27

OtherAcknowledged AI output tenderedchat-outputoffered by courtchallenge: nonesensitive matter — ruling only

The High Court used ChatGPT to ask about bail when assault is laced with cruelty, then expressly limited the reference. It stated the chatbot answer was not an opinion on the merits and should not be used by the trial court.

The court's finding, in its words

The ChatGPT reference was only intended to present a broader picture on bail jurisprudence.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: damiencharlotin.com · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · court's own copy read
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC BY 4.0)
Notes: Downloaded lead PDF copy read; no official Indian court source or publication-ban status confirmed.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the SafeLegalAI editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-08v0.1.3coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub