X v. Y

District Court of Gelderland · Netherlands · 2024-07-26 · ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2024:4474

OtherAcknowledged AI output tenderedchat-outputoffered by courtchallenge: none

A Dutch judge disclosed using ChatGPT to assist with technical elements in a private dispute. The row is coded as judicial AI use rather than party evidence; no independent evidentiary challenge or sanction was found in the copied decision text.

The court's finding, in its words

The judge disclosed using ChatGPT to assist with technical calculations, not as independent evidence.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC0)
Notes: Official Rechtspraak URL was identified from the PDF but failed TLS fetch; downloaded lead PDF copy was read. Publication-ban status not confirmed.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub