Courts on AI / evidence / rules
Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 section 63 Electronic-record admissibility rule · rule
Status as of 2024-07-01
In force
Effective: 2024-07-01
Section 63 is not AI-specific, but it governs admissibility of electronic and digital records in India through computer-output conditions and certificates. It is included as a baseline electronic-records rule relevant to AI-generated or AI-processed evidence.
Operative text Electronic or digital records are admissible as documents if the statutory computer-output conditions and certificate requirements in section 63 are satisfied. Short verbatim extract (≤25 words); the instrument is linked below.
Instrument indiacode.nic.in Read 2026-09-07 · link only — not yet readprovisional Found via India Code official portal, User brief Notes India Code returned HTTP 403 to fetch; section text should be verified manually from the official portal or Gazette. The status shown is the issuing body's, quoted and dated; it is re-checked after each committee meeting or legislative action. This page describes where an instrument stands — it is not advice on what evidence rules require. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record .
compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial team method as of 2026-09-07 v0.1.1 coding CC BY 4.0 JSON Hugging Face GitHub
Disclaimer · Last checked 2026-09-07
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation.
Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. Full disclaimer → · Something wrong? Report it →