California Judicial Council Rule 10.430 and Standard 10.80

Generative AI guardrails for California court-related work · CA · guidance

Status as of 2025-09-01

In force

“The Artificial Intelligence Task Force recommends adopting one rule of court and one standard of judicial administration.” — source

Effective: 2025-09-01

The California Judicial Council adopted Rule 10.430 and Standard 10.80 for responsible generative AI use in court-related work. The framework is not an evidence-admissibility rule, but it addresses oversight, confidentiality, public trust, and disclosure of court-generated AI materials.

Operative text

Adopt California Rules of Court, rule 10.430 and California Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 10.80, to address the use of generative artificial intelligence for court-related work.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words); the instrument is linked below.

Instrument: jcc.legistar.com · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: California Judicial Council AI Task Force page, User brief
Notes: Official Legistar item was readable. No separate evidence-specific exhibit rule was located; this row records the statewide AI court-work framework requested by the brief.

The status shown is the issuing body's, quoted and dated; it is re-checked after each committee meeting or legislative action. This page describes where an instrument stands — it is not advice on what evidence rules require. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub