Skip to content

Courts on AI / evidence / rules

Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707

Machine-generated evidence reliability gatekeeping · proposed rule

Status as of

Not advanced

“The Advisory Committee has not come to a formal decision on this issue.” — source

Next: No Evidence Rule 707 appears in the August 2026 preliminary draft; monitor future Evidence Rules agenda books.

The Advisory Committee published proposed Rule 707 in August 2025 to apply Rule 702 reliability standards when machine-generated evidence substitutes for expert testimony. The May 2026 agenda reflects continued study and controversy rather than advancement to the next rulemaking stage.

Operative text

Rule 707. Machine-Generated Evidence When machine-generated evidence is offered without an expert witness and would be subject to Rule 702 if testified to by a witness, the court may admit the evidence only if it satisfies the requirements of Rule 702(a)-(d). This rule does not apply to the output of simple scientific instruments.

Verbatim; United States government works are public domain.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub