NCSC/TRI bench card: acknowledged AI-generated evidence

Bench card for disclosed AI exhibits · bench card

Status as of 2026-01

Published

“ANY USE OF AI-GENERATED EXHIBITS should be clearly labelled as such.” — source

The NCSC/TRI bench card guides judges when AI use is acknowledged, including enhanced images, simulations, data analysis, and biometric tools. It emphasizes labeling, process reliability, preservation of source material, chain of custody, and expert assistance where appropriate.

Operative text

AI-generated exhibits should be clearly labelled for the fact-finder at all times.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words); the instrument is linked below.

Instrument: ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: NCSC/TRI AI Policy Consortium
Notes: NCSC content treated as copyrighted; only short quotations used.

The status shown is the issuing body's, quoted and dated; it is re-checked after each committee meeting or legislative action. This page describes where an instrument stands — it is not advice on what evidence rules require. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub