VP Evans Ors v. HMRC

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) · United Kingdom · 2025-08-22 · [2025] UKFTT 1112 (TC) · TC09638

OtherAcknowledged AI output tendereddocumentoffered by courtchallenge: none

The tribunal disclosed remarks on judicial AI use in a case-management decision, referencing official judiciary guidance and eJudiciary Copilot Chat. The AI was discussed as a secure summarisation or support tool for judicial office holders, not as party evidence determining contested facts.

Rules cited: Tribunal Procedure Rules

The court's finding, in its words

Any use of AI by or on behalf of the judiciary must protect the integrity of the administration of justice.

Short verbatim extract (≤25 words) for identification; the judgment is linked below and is the record.

Decision: caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC0)

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions were checked on the read date. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub