United States v. Reffitt

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia · DC · United States · 2022-04-10 · 602 F. Supp. 3d 85 · 1:21-cr-00032

AdmittedOthervideooffered by prosecutionchallenge: none

The Reffitt materials reviewed on GovInfo concern conventional January 6 video and audio evidence, not AI fabrication or deepfake authentication. The row is retained because the case was named in the collection brief; no AI-specific evidentiary ruling was confirmed in the public document read.

Rules cited: Fed. R. Evid. 401 · Fed. R. Evid. 403

This decision in the coded corpus of US decisions on generative AI →

Decision: govinfo.gov
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: User brief named-case list
Notes: Zero-finding row: no AI/deepfake issue located in the GovInfo document read.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions were checked on the read date. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub