Demissie v. Ford

U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada · NV · United States · 2025-10-02 · 2:25-cv-00504

Not adjudicatedAlleged deepfakevideooffered by defendantchallenge: sanctions

A pro se plaintiff accused defendants and counsel of altering or fabricating body-worn-camera exhibits with AI and sought sanctions. The court reviewed the record and sealed exhibits, found no credible support for the accusation, denied relief, and left reconsideration possible if real evidence emerged.

Rules cited: Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 · Fed. R. Civ. P. 37

The court's finding, in its words

The Court found no credible evidence supporting plaintiff's claim that defense counsel fabricated or altered body-worn-camera footage.

Verbatim; United States court documents are public domain.

This decision in the coded corpus of US decisions on generative AI →

Decision: damiencharlotin.com
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin deepfakes lead CSV (CC0), User brief named-case list

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions were checked on the read date. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub