Hunt v. Morissette

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · MI · United States · 2025-06-11 · 2:24-cv-12947

No weight givenAcknowledged AI output tenderedchat-outputoffered by plaintiffchallenge: weight

A pro se plaintiff relied on Ask.AI-style legal material in opposing dismissal. The court explained that AI outputs can be unreliable and unhelpful, rejected reliance on them, dismissed claims, and warned that future pleadings should not include or rely on AI-generated legal argument.

Rules cited: Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 · Fed. R. Civ. P. 11

The court's finding, in its words

Because AI-generated material is unlikely to be helpful to the Court, Hunt should not include or rely upon AI-generated material.

Verbatim; United States court documents are public domain.

This decision in the coded corpus of US decisions on generative AI →

Decision: damiencharlotin.com · archived copy
Read: 2026-09-07 · primary document read
Found via: Damien Charlotin acknowledged-AI-output lead CSV (CC0)

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions were checked on the read date. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub