Freedman Normand Friedland LLP v. Cyrulnik

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · NY · United States · 2023-04-05 · 1:21-cv-01746

Not adjudicatedDeepfake defence to genuine evidenceexpert-reportoffered by plaintiffchallenge: admissibility

The brief identified an April 2023 order involving proposed deepfake expert material. Public searches located docket summaries but no court-hosted ECF 380 or full order. The row records the lead as unconfirmed and should be revisited with PACER or another primary copy.

Rules cited: Fed. R. Evid. 702 · Fed. R. Civ. P. 37

This decision in the coded corpus of US decisions on generative AI →

Decision: courtlistener.com
Read: 2026-09-07 · link only — not yet readprovisional
Found via: User brief named-case list
Notes: No publicly fetchable primary order located; CourtListener docket page used only as locator, not a read opinion. Publication-ban status not confirmed.

No alleged media is hosted or linked. Where the court found material genuine or fabricated, the finding is the court's; where a party merely alleged it, this page says so. Publication restrictions have not yet been checked for this row. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub