Éditions Dalloz, Lexbase, LexisNexis, Lextenso, Lamy Liaisons v. Forseti (Doctrine)

Cour d’appel de Paris, Pôle 5, Chambre 1 · RG No. 23/06063 · filed 2018-10 · France · Legal database terms

judgmentForsetiDoctrine.fr

Where it stands (2026-09-07): Paris Court of Appeal judgment dated May 7, 2025 found unfair competition and awarded damages to legal publishers; official court page was blocked to automated access.

French legal publishers challenged Forseti’s Doctrine.fr case-law collection practices. Public legal reporting and the official decision listing identify a May 2025 Paris Court of Appeal judgment finding unfair competition based on large-scale illicit collection of court decisions.

Milestones

2025-05-07Paris Court of Appeal issued judgment in RG No. 23/06063 concerning Doctrine.fr’s case-law collection practices. · document

Docket / decision: courdecassation.fr
Read: 2026-09-07 · link only — not yet readprovisional
Found via: user brief, Cour de cassation link, Legalis article
Notes: Official Cour de cassation page blocked automated access; Legalis article was read for public details, so this row needs human verification against the official judgment text.

Allegations are recorded as the pleadings frame them and paired with the court's disposition. Court documents are public domain; this page is a record of the docket, not a view on the merits. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub