Bathsheba Nichole Adams v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al.

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

38-1 at 17–18); see Lary v. Trinity Phys. Fin. & Ins. Services, 780 F. 3d 1101 (11th Cir. 2015). These hallucinations allow the Court to infer that Plaintiff prepared her filing with the use of generativeartificialintelligence(“AI”). Whiletheuseofsuch a tool is not necessarily problematic, the failure to confirm the accuracy of the filing is. Rule 11 requires either a party or an attorney to sign every pleading, motion, or other paper and provides that this signature constitutes a certificate that thesignerhasreadthedocumentandverifieditsaccuracy. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Thisdutyincludesensuringthatallcitations are accurate as well as any quoted portions or descriptions of the referenced case. Plaintiff's pro se status does not relieve her of this requirement.

Authorities cited in the passage: Lary v. Trinity Phys. Fin. & Ins. Services, 780 F · Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 · Ellsworth v. Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 148 Ariz. 17, 19 (App. 1985), which the Court found does not exist · Ellsworth v. Am. Arb. Ass'n, 148 P.3d 983 (Utah 2006) (arbitration issue) · Aguilar v. ASARCO · Lary v. Trinity Phys. Fin. & Ins. Services